Skip to content

CORFLO SBF Convenience Kit 20-9431KRecalls & reported problems

Corpak Medsystems, Inc. · NG tube and convenience kit for small bowel tube placement · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10815149023929), received between Aug 28, 2017 and Aug 28, 2017 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1

Patient problems

  • Nausea1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 28, 2017Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH A DIGESTIVE HEALTH TUBE (DHT) WHICH WAS PLACED ON (B)(6) 2017 HAD THE TUBE FEEDS AND FREE WATER INFUSING. OVERNIGHT ON (B)(6) 2017 THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF EPIGASTRIC PAIN, NAUSEA, AND SHORTNESS OF BREATH. THE TUBE FEED PUMP ALSO ALARMED NOTING "CLOG DOWNSTREAM OF PUMP" AND TUBE WAS UNABLE TO BE FLUSHED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS AT THE BEDSIDE TO ASSESS THE PATIENT AND THE NURSE ATTEMPTED TO UNCLOG DHT WITH WARM WATER. THE PHYSICIAN ORDERED CHEST X-RAY (CXR), ABDOMINAL X-RAY (AXR), ELECTROCARDIOGRAM (EKG) AND TROPONIN LAB VALUES. THE AXR IMAGE SHOWED THAT DHT WAS IN TWO SEPARATE PIECES WITHIN THE PATIENT'S ABDOMEN. THE PHYSICIAN IMMEDIATELY ASSESSED THE IMAGE AND EXPEDITED READING AND INTERPRETATION OF THE X-RAY RESULTS FROM RADIOLOGY, WHO CONFIRMED THAT THE TUBE WAS BROKEN WITHIN THE PATIENT'S ABDOMEN. THE PHYSICIAN CONTACTED THE GASTROINTESTINAL (GI) DEPARTMENT FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTION. THE TUBE FEEDS WERE HELD PER PHYSICIANS ORDER AND PATIENT NOTHING BY MOUTH (NPO) UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED 04-AUG-2017 STATED BOTH PIECES OF FEEDING TUBE WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. IT IS UNKNOWN WHAT PROCEDURE TOOK PLACE TO REMOVE TUBE.

    Patient problems: Nausea; Pain

    MAUDE report 6823913 ↗

Other TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices

All TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page