Skip to content

Zilver 518 G43777Recalls & reported problems

Cook Ireland Ltd · Zilver 518 Vascular Stent · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Zilver 518 (20)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002437774), received between Jun 7, 2018 and May 15, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Off-Label Use” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Off-Label Use3
  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 15, 2026Off-Label Use

    A PATIENT OF UNDISCLOSED AGE AND GENDER UNDERWENT AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE IN WHICH THE ZILVER 518 VASCULAR SELF-EXPANDING STENT, G43777, WAS USED. THE HUB OF THE DETACHMENT PART ON THE CATHETER CAME APART FROM THE SHEATH AND THE CATHETER WOULD NOT DEPLOY/DETACH. THEY PULLED THE RED SAFETY TAB, HAD SOME RESISTANCE WHEN TRYING TO PIN PULL. THEY DID ADMIT IT MAY HAVE BEEN USER ERROR- WAS UNNECESSARILY FORCEFUL WITH THE BLACK HUB. THEY WERE ABLE TO SAFELY REMOVE THE DEFECTIVE ZILBER AND PLACE A NEW ZILVER SUCCESSFULLY. NO ISSUES WITH PATIENT AND NO ADDITIONAL MEASURES WERE NECESSARY. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE, AND NO DAMAGE WAS SEEN. THE TARGET LOCATION FOR THE STENT WAS THE TRANSVERSE VENOUS SINUS (OFF IFU) TO TREAT THE DISEASE PATHOLOGY OF IDIOPATHIC INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION (IIH). PRE-DILATION WAS NOT PERFORMED AHEAD OF STENT PLACEMENT. AN ASAHI WIRE GUIDE WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT HAD NO STENTS PREVIOUSLY PLACED DURING PRIOR PROCEDURES BUT DID EXHIBIT DIFFICULT, TORTUOUS ANATOMY. NO RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DELIVERY SYSTEM TO THE TARGET LOCATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25191574 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 14, 2023Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use

    AS REPORTED TO CUSTOMER RELATIONS VIA PHONE CONVERSATION "UNABLE TO UN-SHEATH THE DEVICE, THIS OCCURRED WHILE THE DEVICE WAS INSIDE THE PATIENT AS THE PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO DEPLOY IT. A NEW G43777-ZIV5-18-125-7-60 WAS OPENED AND USED TO COMPLETE THE INTENDED PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY". DID ANY UNINTENDED SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY? - NO. · IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE. - N/A. WAS THE PATIENT HOSPITALIZED OR WAS THERE PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? - NO. DID THE PATIENT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? - NO. · IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE. - N/A. DID THE PRODUCT CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES? - NO. · IF YES, PLEASE SPECIFY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES AND PROVIDE DETAILS. - N/A. HAS THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? - NO. HAS THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EFFECTS? - NO. · PLEASE SPECIFY ADVERSE EFFECTS AND PROVIDE DETAILS. - N/A. 3.32 ARE IMAGES OF THE DEVICE OR PROCEDURE AVAILABLE? N/A, YES, NO. 3.33 AT WHAT STAGE OF THE PROCEDURE DID THE COMPLAINT OCCUR? UNPACKING OR PREPARATION OF THE DEVICE, INSER

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16535692 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 10, 2019Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem

    THE COMPLAINT ZIV5-18-125-7-60 WAS USED FOR EVT. THE ACCESS WAS OBTAINED FROM THE FEMORAL ARTERY. WHEN THE PHYSICIAN DELIVERED THE DEVICE WITH A CONTRALATERAL APPROACH, THE RADIOPAQUE MARKER OF THE PROXIMAL TIP ON THE SHEATH BECAME OUT OF POSITION WHILE THE RADIOPAQUE MARKERS ON THE DISTAL TIP AND A STENT DID NOT MOVE. THE PHYSICIAN CONTINUED TO USE THE COMPLAINT DEVICE AND ENDED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO OTHER PROBLEMS, AND THE PATIENT REPORTEDLY EXPERIENCED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THIS INCIDENT. UPDATED ON APRIL 2, 2019 BY (B)(6): THE PROXIMAL RADIOPAQUE MARKER ON THE INNER CATHETER BECAME OUT OF POSITION. THE PROXIMAL RADIOPAQUE MARKER ON THE INNER CATHETER BECAME OUT OF POSITION WHILE THE DISTAL RADIOPAQUE MARKER OF THE SHEATH AND THE RADIOPAQUE MARKER ON THE STENT DID NOT MOVE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8598537 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 7, 2018Off-Label Use; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Off-Label Use; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem

    THIS DEVICE BECAME STUCK INSIDE OF A NAVIEN GUIDE CATH. THE INNER DIAMETER OF THE NAVIEN .IS 072 IN / 1.8 MM. THE COOK DEVICE HAS AN OUTER DIAMETER OF .066 IN / 167 MM. THE STENT WENT IN BUT WOULD NOT COME OUT. IN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE STENT FROM THE GUIDE CATH, IT STRETCHED THE STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM. THE STENT WAS NOT DEPLOYED IN THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER STENT. THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED BENCH TOP AFTER THE PROCEDURE AND THE STENT LOOKED DAMAGED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7576997 ↗

Other STENT, ILIAC devices

All STENT, ILIAC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page