Skip to content

Universa G49977Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Universa Soft Ureteral Stent and Positioner with Hydrophilic Coating · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Universa (82)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002499772), received between Apr 12, 2018 and Feb 17, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Material Separation1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging1
  • Torn Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 17, 2026

    6FR COOK MEDICAL STENT- TEAR IN THE STENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24363961 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 9, 2024Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

    AS REPORTED, A 'UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET' WAS BROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING EVENT DETAILS, PATIENT ANATOMY AND OUTCOME HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19703374 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 1, 2023Break; Material Twisted/Bent; Break; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET WAS USED DURING A CYSTOSCOPY, RIGHT URETEROSCOPY, RIGHT URETERAL STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE. THE PHYSICIAN STATED IT WAS "BROKEN". A NEW STENT FROM THE SAME LOT WAS USED AND WORKED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE EVENT AND PATIENT OUTCOME HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17849348 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 20, 2019Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED, PRIOR TO A URETEROSCOPY WITH A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, A UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET WAS INSPECTED, AND UPON INSPECTION IT WAS FOUND THAT THERE WAS A CRACK IN THE LINING. THIS WAS FOUND BEFORE IT MADE PATIENT CONTACT. ANOTHER UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET WAS OPENED AND USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8911746 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 13, 2018Torn Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE, THERE WAS A SMALL TEAR ON THE DISTAL END OF THE URETERAL STENT. IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT THE PROXIMAL COIL WAS TORN STARTING AT THE LAST SIDEPORT AND CONTINUING THROUGH THE END OF THE TUBING. THE PHYSICIAN USED ANOTHER DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE AND NO PATIENT HARMS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7428532 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 12, 2018Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE, A SMALL TEAR WAS FOUND ON THE URETERAL STENT. IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT THE STENT WAS TORN STARTING AT THE FIRST SIDE-PORT AND STOPPED BEFORE GOING THROUGH THE TIP. THE CUSTOMER USED ANOTHER DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE AND NO PATIENT HARMS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7424734 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page