Skip to content

Advance G52254Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Advance, 35LP Low Profile PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of Advance (206)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002522548), received between Jul 13, 2018 and Oct 19, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture3
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Inflation Problem1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Perforation of Vessels1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 19, 2023Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture

    AS REPORTED, DURING ANGIOPLASTY, AN ADVANCE 35 LP LOW PROFILE BALLOON CATHETER'S BALLOON RUPTURED. A COOK SHEATH AND WIRE GUIDE WERE USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE ANATOMY WAS REPORTEDLY NOT TORTUOUS OR CALCIFIED. VENOPLASTY WAS PERFORMED FOR RIGHT BRACHIOCEPHALIC STENOSIS. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED TO AN UNKNOWN PRESSURE; HOWEVER, THE BALLOON REPORTEDLY RUPTURED. THE BALLOON RETURNED TO AMBIENT PRESSURE AND NEGATIVE PRESSURE WAS MAINTAINED UPON ATTEMPTED REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE; HOWEVER, A COUNTERCLOCKWISE ROTATION WAS NOT CONDUCTED. THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS UNABLE TO BE REMOVED OVER THE WIRE; THEREFORE, THE BALLOON CATHETER AND THE WIRE GUIDE WERE REMOVED TOGETHER. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17965168 ↗
  • InjurySep 11, 2018Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: Perforation of Vessels

    MAUDE report 7865404 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 13, 2018Inflation Problem; Material Rupture; Material Integrity Problem; Inflation Problem; Material Rupture; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED, DURING TREATMENT OF FEMORAL ARTERY OCCLUSIONS OF THE PATIENT'S LOWER EXTREMITIES, THE ADVANCE 35 LP LOW PROFILE BALLOON CATHETER COULD NOT BE INFLATED. THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED THE BALLOON THROUGH THE CALCIFIED ARTERY TO THE TARGET SITE. AFTER DISCOVERING THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WOULD NOT INFLATE, IT WAS WITHDRAWN. A SPLIT WAS FOUND IN THE BALLOON. A 6 FRENCH SHEATH WAS BEING UTILIZED DURING THE PROCEDURE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS CHANGED FOR A NEW BALLOON CATHETER AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7686640 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page