Skip to content

Advance G52267Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Advance, 35LP Low Profile PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of Advance (206)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002522678), received between Jul 17, 2017 and Apr 18, 2024 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture2
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Material Discolored1
  • Material Puncture/Hole1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    AS REPORTED, DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING TREATMENT OF A LESION AND IN-STENT STENOSIS WITHIN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, AN ADVANCE 35 LP LOW PROFILE BALLOON CATHETER'S BALLOON RUPTURED. A COOK SHEATH WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE ANATOMY ITSELF WAS REPORTEDLY NOT STENOSED, TORTUOUS, OR CALCIFIED. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED ONE TIME TO NOMINAL PRESSURE WITHIN THE STENOSED STENT, USING AN UNSPECIFIED INFLATION DEVICE, AT WHICH POINT THE BALLOON RUPTURED. BLOOD WAS NOTED IN THE INFLATION DEVICE. THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS SAFELY REMOVED BY ITSELF. THE PHYSICIAN WAS REPORTEDLY ABLE TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED RESULT WITH THE COMPLIANT DEVICE. A 6X20 COOK BALLOON WAS ALSO USED WITH NO ISSUES, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19139432 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 26, 2023Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16245689 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 25, 2017Material Discolored; Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO ADDRESS A "HARD OCCLUSION". AFTER USING DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES, THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO USE A CXI CATHETER TO PASS THE OCCLUSION. HOWEVER, THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS NOT EASILY ADVANCED. SUBSEQUENTLY, FORCE WAS NEEDED TO REMOVE THE BALLOON CATHETER FROM THE PATIENT. VISUAL EXAMINATION REVEALED COLOR CHANGES IN THE SHAFT OF THE BALLOON CATHETER. AS A RESULT, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED NOT TO CONTINUE USING THE BALLOON CATHETER TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6740327 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 17, 2017Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT UPON INFLATION, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES NOR EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6717409 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page