Advance G52271Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Advance, 35LP Low Profile PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Advance (206)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10827002522715), received between Feb 21, 2019 and Feb 21, 2019 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 21, 2019Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED, AN ADVANCE 35 LP LOW PROFILE BALLOON CATHETER RUPTURED DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE OF TWO STENTS (MANUFACTURER UNKNOWN) DUE TO IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. THE LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE (B)(6) MALE'S COMPLETELY OCCLUDED LEFT POPLITEAL ARTERY. ACCESS WAS GAINED FROM THE RIGHT GROIN. THE RUPTURE OCCURRED WHEN ATTEMPTING TO DEFLATE THE BALLOON INSIDE THE STENT. THE BALLOON WAS UNABLE TO COMPLETELY ENTER THE COOK 6FR SHEATH FOR REMOVAL BECAUSE IT APPEARED TO "BALL UP" AT THE END. THE BALLOON DID TRACK OVER ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S 0.14 WIRE AND WAS REMOVED WITH THE SHEATH (ALTHOUGH NOT COMPLETELY INSIDE THE SHEATH). THE BALLOON DID NOT SEPARATE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER SHEATH AND ANOTHER BALLOON. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED. THE TYPE AND RATIO OF CONTRAST WAS UNKNOWN. ONLY ONE INFLATION WAS PERFORMED; THE PRESSURE WAS OVER NOMINAL PRESSURE BUT NOT OVER BURST PRESSURE. THE PATIENT'S VESSEL WAS NEITHER TORTUOUS NOR CALCIFIED. THERE WAS NO ANGULATION PRESENT. IT IS NOT CERTAIN IF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE RUPTURED LONGITUDINALLY OR CIRCUMFERENTIALLY. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECT NOR REQUIRE
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8358203 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page