Advance G52273Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Advance, 35LP Low Profile PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Advance (206)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002522739), received between Jun 4, 2020 and May 16, 2022 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture3
- Break1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 16, 2022Break; Material Rupture; Material Separation; Break; Material Rupture; Material Separation
AS REPORTED, AN ADVANCE 35 LP LOW PROFILE BALLOON CATHETER RUPTURED CIRCUMFERENTIALLY AND TIRE IN HALF. THE HIGHLY CALCIFIED LESION WAS AT THE COMMON ILIAC ARTERY AND STENTED WITH AN UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER'S STENT. THE BALLOON WAS INSERTED THROUGH AN UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER'S 7FR SHEATH WITH ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S GUIDE WIRE, INFLATED TO 7 ATMOSPHERES, AND SUBSEQUENTLY RUPTURED AND SEPARATED. THE BALLOON WAS REMOVED BY THE USER AND ALL PORTIONS OF THE DEVICE WERE CAPTURED INTO THE SHEATH. BLOOD WAS NOTED IN THE INFLATION DEVICE AND THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED INSIDE A STENT PRIOR TO THE RUPTURE. A SECOND ADVANCE 35 LP LOW PROFILE BALLOON CATHETER RUPTURED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE AND WILL BE REPORTED UNDER COOK REFERENCE # (B)(4). THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THE OCCURRENCE. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14411106 ↗MalfunctionMar 1, 2021Material Rupture; Material Rupture
NO NEW PATIENT OR EVENT INFORMATION SINCE THE LAST REPORT WAS SUBMITTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11392425 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10119435 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page