Skip to content

Advance G52274Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Advance, 35LP Low Profile PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of Advance (206)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002522746), received between Jan 19, 2017 and May 17, 2018 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture3

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 17, 2018Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT. REFER TO SECTION H10 FOR INVESTIGATION FINDINGS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7523364 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 12, 2017Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ADVANCE 35 LOW PROFILE BALLOON CATHETER WAS BEING USED FOR PRE-DILATION OF AN IN-STENT OCCLUSION OF AN ILIAC ARTERY. THE BALLOON RUPTURED. IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH DIRECTION THE BALLOON RUPTURED. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE A SECOND ADVANCE 35 LP LOW PROFILE BALLOON CATHETER, SEE MFR REPORT 1820334-2017-00705. THE SECOND CATHETER RUPTURED AS WELL. ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S DEVICE WAS THEN USED TO PERFORM PRE-DILATION. AFTER ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S STENT PLACEMENT DURING POST-DILATION THE VESSEL RUPTURED. ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S STENT GRAFT WAS THEN PLACED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE HAVE BEEN NO ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6486751 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 19, 2017Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6263642 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page