Formula 418 G56609Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Formula 418, Renal Balloon-Expandable Stent · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Formula 418 (12)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10827002566092), received between Oct 25, 2024 and Oct 25, 2024 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Premature Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 25, 2024Premature Separation; Premature Separation
AS REPORTED, DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING IMPLANTATION OF A STENT WITHIN THE RENAL ARTERY, A FORMULA 418 RENAL BALLOON-EXPANDABLE STENT SLIPPED OFF THE BALLOON. THE DEVICE WAS LOADED THROUGH ANOTHER MANUFACTURER¿S 6-FRENCH GUIDE AND ADVANCED NEAR THE RENAL ARTERY. THE INSERTION TOOL WAS NOT USED TO INSERT THE DEVICE INTO THE GUIDE/SHEATH; HOWEVER, A LARGE TUOHY-BORST ADAPTER WAS USED DURING INSERTION. THE STENT WAS NOT MOISTENED WITH HEPARINIZED SALINE AND GAUZE WAS NOT USED TO MOISTEN THE STENT. THE REFERENCE VESSEL DIAMETER WAS APPROXIMATELY SIX MILLIMETERS, AND THE LESION WAS LESS THAN FIVE CENTIMETERS LONG. THE ANATOMY WAS TORTUOUS, AND THE LESION WAS CALCIFIED AND NINETY PERCENT STENOSED. AS THE USER ATTEMPTED TO MANEUVER THE STENT THROUGH THE STENOSED LESION, THE STENT SLIPPED OFF THE BALLOON. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO QUICKLY CAPTURE AND RETRIEVE THE STENT USING ANOTHER MANUFACTURER¿S BALLOON, AND THE STENT WAS THEN DEPLOYED AND IMPLANTED IN THE RENAL ARTERY AS INTENDED. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES OR EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20537816 ↗
Other STENT, RENAL devices
- Express® SD Renal/Biliary H74937912618150Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, RENAL27 reports
- Herculink Elite 1011487-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, RENAL27 reports
- Herculink Elite 1011487-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, RENAL24 reports
- Herculink Elite 1011493-18Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, RENAL1 death16 reports
- Herculink Elite 1011487-18Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, RENAL13 reports
- Herculink Elite 1011499-18Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, RENAL13 reports
- Herculink Elite 1011499-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, RENAL12 reports
- Herculink Elite 1011493-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, RENAL11 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page