Isolator Surgical Ablation System EMR2 (REF A000452)Recalls & reported problems
Atricure, Inc. · Isolator Synergy Surgical Ablation System, Glidepath Tape, Right Curve · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10840143902161), received between Oct 13, 2023 and Jul 28, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Use of Device Problem2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient2
- Arrhythmia1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 28, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
A PATIENT UNDERWENT CARDIAC TISSUE ABLATION FOR TREATMENT OF IST USING EMR2 CLAMP AS PART OF THE HEAL-IST IDE TRIAL (G210309). A PICC LINE HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY PLACED FOR AN UNDISCLOSED CONDITION. THE PHYSICIAN ABLATED ACROSS THE SVC AND DID NOT WITHDRAW THE PICC LINE PRIOR TO THE ABLATION, DESPITE ADVISEMENT FROM ATRICURE PERSONNEL IN ATTENDANCE. A CHEST X-RAY DONE ON (B)(6) 2025 SHOWED A POTENTIAL FOREIGN BODY IN PATIENT'S LEFT PULMONARY ARTERY. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE FOREIGN BODY WAS THE TIP OF A PICC LINE WHICH WAS DAMAGED DURING THE EPICARDIAL ABLATION. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED ON (B)(6) 2025 FOR REMOVAL OF THE ¿DISTAL FRAGMENT OF THE PICC LINE¿ BY INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. THERE WAS NO PRODUCT MALFUNCTION, AND THE EVENT WAS THE RESULT OF A USE ERROR.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 22628937 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
A PATIENT UNDERWENT ROBOTIC VATS CARDIAC TISSUE ABLATION FOR TREATMENT OF IST USING EMR2 CLAMP. A PORT-A-CATH HAD BEEN PLACED ONE DAY PRIOR FOR AN UNDISCLOSED CONDITION. THE PHYSICIAN ABLATED ACROSS THE SVC AND DID NOT WITHDRAW THE PORT-A-CATH PRIOR TO THE ABLATION, DESPITE ADVISEMENT FROM ATRICURE PERSONNEL IN ATTENDANCE. POST-OPERATIVELY, A CHEST X-RAY SHOWED THAT A 2-3 CM SEGMENT OF PORT-A-CATH HAD BEEN SHEARED OFF AND WAS LODGED IN LOWER LOBE OF PATIENT¿S LEFT LUNG. THE SEGMENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED IN A SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURE BY INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. THERE WAS NO PRODUCT MALFUNCTION, AND THE EVENT WAS THE RESULT OF A USE ERROR.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 22523718 ↗InjuryOct 13, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2023, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A SINUS NODE MODIFICATION PROCEDURE. AFTER THE EPICARDIAL PORTION OF THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT'S HEART RHYTHM CONVERTED FROM SINUS TO JUNCTIONAL. BOTH THE EPICARDIAL AND ENDOCARDIAL PORTION OF THE PROCEDURE WERE COMPLETED, AS PLANNED. POST-OPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT REMAINED IN JUNCTIONAL RHYTHM AND WAS DISCHARGED FROM HOSPITAL WITHOUT INTERVENTION ON THE THIRD POSTOPERATIVE DAY. JUNCTIONAL RHYTHM PERSISTED ALONG WITH SYMPTOMS RELATED TO CHRONOTROPIC INCOMPETENCE. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED ON (B)(6) 2023 FOR IMPLANTATION OF DUAL CHAMBER PACEMAKER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED DEVICE MALFUNCTION, AND THE ADVERSE EVENT WAS THE RESULT OF A PROCEDURAL COMPLICATION.
Patient problems: Arrhythmia
MAUDE report 17933977 ↗
Other Surgical Device, For Cutting, Coagulation, And/Or Ablation Of Tissue, Including Cardiac Tissue devices
- Cardioblate® CryoFlex® 60SF3Medtronic, Inc. · Surgical Device, For cutting, coagulation, and/or ablation of tissue, including cardiac tissue1 recall7 deaths41 reports
- Cardioblate® CryoFlex® 60SF2Medtronic, Inc. · Surgical Device, For cutting, coagulation, and/or ablation of tissue, including cardiac tissue1 recall13 reports
- Cardioblate® CryoFlex® 65CS1Medtronic, Inc. · Surgical Device, For cutting, coagulation, and/or ablation of tissue, including cardiac tissue1 recall1 death11 reports
- Cardioblate® CryoFlex® 65CS1Medtronic, Inc. · Surgical Device, For cutting, coagulation, and/or ablation of tissue, including cardiac tissue1 recall1 death6 reports
- CARDIOBLATE® GEMINI® 49260Medtronic, Inc. · Surgical Device, For cutting, coagulation, and/or ablation of tissue, including cardiac tissue1 recall1 report
- Cardioblate® CryoFlex® 60SF7Medtronic, Inc. · Surgical Device, For cutting, coagulation, and/or ablation of tissue, including cardiac tissue1 recall1 report
- Fusion Ablation System 001-700-002Atricure, Inc. · Surgical Device, For Cutting, Coagulation, And/Or Ablation Of Tissue, Including Cardiac Tissue1 recall0 reports
- Cardioblate® CryoFlex® 60CM1Medtronic, Inc. · Surgical Device, For cutting, coagulation, and/or ablation of tissue, including cardiac tissue1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page