GUIDELINER IPN913566Recalls & reported problems
Teleflex Incorporated · GuideLiner V3 5.5F · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10841156100582), received between Jan 7, 2021 and Jan 7, 2021 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 7, 2021Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
WHEN ADVANCING THE STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM, THE USER FELT MUCH RESISTANCE, SO PHYSICIAN TRIED TO WITHDRAW THE STENT, BUT IT WAS UNABLE TO DO IT, THEN THE USER WITHDREW THE STENT AND THE GUIDELINER TOGETHER. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW 5.5F GUIDELINER AND A NEW STENT. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED. DURING PRELIMINARY INSPECTION OF RETURNED DEVICE ON (B)(6) 2020 IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE RX LUMEN WAS MISSING. THE ACCOUNT WAS INQUIRED ON (B)(6) 2020 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE PROCEDURE. RESPONSE WAS RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2020. THE VESSEL WAS TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED. IT WAS NOTED THAT A WHOLE SET OF DEVICES WERE REMOVED TOGETHER FROM THE PATIENT BODY AND WAS DIFFICULT. THE RX LUMEN IS LIKELY TO HAVE GOT STUCK WITHIN THE GUIDE CATHETER DUE TO CONCOMITANT DEVICE INTERACTION WITH OTHER DEVICES SUCH AS STENT SYSTEM, GUIDEWIRE AND GUIDE CATHETER. THE ACCOUNT ALSO STATED THAT THE SEPARATION OF THE RX LUMEN DID NOT OCCUR INSIDE THE PATIENT BODY. THE SEPARATED SHAFT WAS NOT RETAINED AND DISCARDED. NO OTHER DEVICES WERE RETURNED FOR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11131409 ↗
Other Catheter, percutaneous devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page