TURNPIKE IPN917515Recalls & reported problems
Teleflex Incorporated · Turnpike Spiral, 135cm, TCT · Class 2
All models of TURNPIKE (18)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10841156108755), received between Jan 17, 2023 and Sep 17, 2024 — classified as 1 death, 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation5
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient2
- Insufficient Information2
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
DeathSep 17, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DIRECTOR AT (B)(6) HOSPITAL, THAT DURING A CTO LAD LESION SURGERY: "LAD WAS VERY TIGHT. COULD NOT PASS 1.5MM BALLOON SO TRIED TO ADVANCE A TURNPIKE THROUGH THE LESION. IT'S BELIEVED THAT THE TURNPIKE TIP MOVEMENT WAS CONSTRICTED, AND THE TURNPIKE CONTINUED TO BE ROTATED MORE THAN 2 FULL 360 DEGREE ROTATIONS. APPROX. 2-3 MM OF THE TURNPIKE TIP BROKE OFF IN THE PATIENT. AFTER THE TIP BROKE OFF, I WAS TOLD A STINGRAY WAS USED TO GO SUBINTIMAL, AND AT SOME POINT, AFTER THAT THE PATIENT STARTED TO DECLINE. THE SEPARATED TIP OCCLUDED FLOW DOWN THE LAD LEADING TO ST ELEVATIONS ON TELEMETRY AND SIGNIFICANT PATIENT PAIN. THE PATIENT WENT INTO CARDIOGENIC SHOCK AND VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION ABOUT 1-2 HOURS LATER. OFFERED SURGERY, BUT PATIENT'S FAMILY WAS ADAMANT THAT SHE DID NOT WANT SURGERY. WERE UNABLE TO REMOVE THE DEVICE AS IT WAS LODGED IN THE LAD LESION. WERE NOT ABLE TO WIRE AROUND THE DEVICE. TRIED DISSECTION AND RE-ENTRY AROUND THE LESION BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. CAUSE OF DEATH: VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION, MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION QUOTED: CARDIOVASCULAR LAB NOTES SUPPLIED BY (B)(6) HOSPITAL TO TELEFLEX: "THE PATIENT WAS BROUGHT TO THE LAB FOR A
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 20234565 ↗InjuryAug 28, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT "TURNPIKE SPIRAL BROKE OFF INSIDE PATIENT DURING PROCEDURE. " ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED FROM THE CUSTOMER.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20083584 ↗InjuryNov 14, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: OPERATOR WAS WORKING ON A HIGHLY CALCIFIED LESION. MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO REVASCULARIZE THE ANATOMY. MULTIPLE PRODUCTS, METHODS AND ACCESS POINT WERE ALL UNSUCCESSFUL. A SPIRAL WAS ATTEMPTED AND WHILE THE OPERATOR WAS WORKING WITH THAT DEVICE, THE TIP SEPARATED. ACCORDING TO THE NURSE LAB MANAGER, THE PHYSICIANS REPORT INDICATES "THE MICRO CATHETER DID BREAK, AND IT (THE TIP) WAS DECIDED TO BE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BEHIND. THIS WAS A VERY SMALL PIECE (APPROXIMATELY 5MM), LEFT IN AN OCCLUDED CALCIFIED ARTERY." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: THE OPERATOR MENTIONED ROTATING BOTH CLOCKWISE AND COUNTERCLOCKWISE (TO OFFSET ANY TORQUE BUILD UP. NO STENTS WERE PLACED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM FROM THE INCIDENT. THEY ARE DUR TO RETURN FOR ANOTHER ATTEMPT AT ANGIOPLASTY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 18129173 ↗InjurySep 1, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO STENT THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA) AND THEN TRIED TO PUT THE TURNPIKE SPIRAL AND GUIDEWIRE INTO THE POSTEROLATERAL (PL) VESSEL, BUT THE SPIRAL TIP GOT STUCK IN NEW STENT. THE TIP OF THE CATHETER BROKE OFF AND WAS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT IN THE RCA AT THE BIFURCATION OF THE PL AND PATENT DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS (PDA) VESSELS. AS PER THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE CATHETER AND THE GUIDEWIRE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND THE SEPARATED TIP WAS STILL IN THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS FINE POST PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 17670491 ↗MalfunctionJan 17, 2023Material Separation; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Material Separation; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "TIP BROKE". ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED FROM THE ACCOUNT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 16184599 ↗
Other Catheter, percutaneous devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page