Skip to content

QUIKCLOT IPN928786Recalls & reported problems

Teleflex Incorporated · QuikClot Interventional Pre-Slit w/ Tegaderm · Class U

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10841495150248), received between Apr 9, 2025 and Apr 10, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Lack of Effect” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 3 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Lack of Effect3

Patient problems

  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 10, 2025Lack of Effect; Lack of Effect

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "STAFF IN MICU WERE TRIALING/EVALUATING PRE-SLIT FOR CVC LINE BLEEDING/OOZING. AFTER INITIAL PLACEMENT OF GAUZE WAS SATURATED AND REPLACED AGAIN AND SAME OCCURRENCE AND REPLACED AGAIN. HEMOSTASIS WAS NOT ACHIEVED SO ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS TAKEN 3 FAILED ATTEMPTS. ACCORDING TO THE (B)(6) THERE WAS NO HARM OR HEALTH CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT." ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS 3011137372-2025-00117 AND 3011137372-2025-00115.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 21812662 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 9, 2025Lack of Effect; Lack of Effect

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "STAFF IN MICU WERE TRAILING/EVALUATING PRE-SLIT FOR CVC LINE BLEEDING/OOZING. AFTER INITIAL PLACEMENT OF GAUZE WAS SATURATED AND REPLACED AGAIN AND SAME OCCURRENCE AND REPLACED AGAIN. HEMOSTASIS WAS NOT ACHIEVED SO ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS TAKEN 3 FAILED ATTEMPTS. ACCORDING TO THE NM THERE WAS NO HARM OR HEALTH CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT." ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS 3011137372-2025-00117, 3011137372-2025-00115 AND 3011137372-2025-00116.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 21806168 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 9, 2025Lack of Effect; Lack of Effect

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "STAFF IN MICU WERE TRIALING/EVALUATING PRE-SLIT FOR CVC LINE BLEEDING/OOZING. AFTER INITIAL PLACEMENT OF GAUZE WAS SATURATED AND REPLACED AGAIN AND SAME OCCURRENCE AND REPLACED AGAIN. HEMOSTASIS WAS NOT ACHIEVED SO ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS TAKEN 3 FAILED ATTEMPTS. ACCORDING TO THE NM THERE WAS NO HARM OR HEALTH CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT." ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 21806162 ↗

Other Dressing, wound, drug devices

All Dressing, wound, drug devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page