Skip to content

CONMED C8675Recalls & reported problems

Conmed Corporation · GRAFT PASSING GUIDE PIN, 2.4 MM X 43 CM · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10845854018330), received between Apr 15, 2020 and Apr 15, 2020 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 15, 2020Break; Break

    THIS DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THEIR CUSTOMER THAT THE C8675 WAS BEING USED DURING A KNEE ARTHROSCOPY ON (B)(6) 2020 WHEN THE DEVICE BROKE WHILE INSIDE THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO REPORT IN DELAY OF THE PROCEDURE AND ANOTHER SAME DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY TO THE PATIENT OR THE USER. FURTHER ASSESSMENT INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED THAT STATES THERE WAS NO FRAGMENTATION OF THE DEVICE; THEREFORE, THERE WERE NO FRAGMENTS OR COMPONENTS TO BE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9963785 ↗

Other TEMPLATE devices

All TEMPLATE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page