Skip to content

WEBSTER F5ADP282RTRecalls & reported problems

Biosense Webster Inc · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10846835000467), received between Nov 4, 2021 and Sep 9, 2024 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Communication or Transmission Problem1
  • Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
  • Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem1
  • Material Separation1
  • Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA PROCEDURE WITH A WEBSTER AND THE TIP WAS DAMAGED/BROKEN ISSUE OCCURRED. DEVICE DAMAGED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE CATHETER WAS BROKEN (AS THE PHOTOS SHOW) WHEN IT WAS INSERTED INTO THE 6F SHEATH. A SECOND DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT REPORTED ON PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 18-AUG-2024. THE TIP WAS DAMAGED/BROKEN. INTERNAL MECHANISM EXPOSED. THERE WAS A CRACK AT THE TIP. THERE WAS NO LIFTED OR DAMAGED ELECTRODES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20173900 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 6, 2024Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem; Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ABLATION PROCEDURE WITH A WEBSTER¿ ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETER AND THERE WAS FOREIGN MATTER IN THE CONNECTOR. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE OPERATION, IT WAS FOUND THAT THERE HAD BEEN FOREIGN MATTER IN THE CONNECTOR PIN HOLES OF THE DEVICE, WHICH MADE IT UNABLE TO CONNECT TO THE CABLE PROPERLY. THERE WAS NO ISSUE WITH MANEUVERING OR WITHDRAWING THE CHARACTER. THE CATHETER PEBAX WAS NOT DAMAGED. A SECOND DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE OPERATION. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT REPORTED ON PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20160994 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 12, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PROCEDURE WITH A WEBSTER CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER WAS FOUND WITH A SCRATCH ON THE SHAFT (WITH NO EXPOSED WIRE). A SECOND DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT REPORTED ON PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19964296 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 2, 2024Material Separation; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem; Material Separation; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AFIB) ABLATION PROCEDURE WITH A WEBSTER AND A HOLE WAS FOUND IN THE SHAFT OF THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS DAMAGED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT BEFORE THE OPERATION, AFTER THE PACKAGE WAS OPENED, THE SHAFT OF THE CATHETER WAS FOUND WITH A HOLE (WITH NO EXPOSED WIRE). A SECOND DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE OPERATION. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT REPORTED ON PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19662670 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2021Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN UNKNOWN PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN ABLATION PROCEDURE WITH A WEBSTER COMPLI. THE STERILE PACKAGE WAS NOT INTACT. INTERIOR PACKAGE DAMAGED. IT WAS REPORTED BY PHYSICIAN THAT THE STERILIZATION PACKAGE WAS BROKEN AND PRODUCT WAS DIRTY. SO THEY DIDN¿T USE THE CATHETER IN/ON PATIENT, REPLACED WITH OTHER NEW ONE. NO PATIENT WAS REPORTED INJURED. OPEN POUCH SEAL IS MDR-REPORTABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12750207 ↗

Other CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING, OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING devices

All CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING, OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page