Skip to content

Celsius D7TBL252RTRecalls & reported problems

Biosense Webster Inc · Class 3

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10846835006056), received between Dec 14, 2023 and Dec 14, 2023 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 14, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ATRIAL TACHYCARDIA RIGHT (R-AT) PROCEDURE WITH A CELSIUS¿ ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETER AND A WIRES EXPOSED ISSUE OCCURRED. THE PHYSICIAN UNPACKED THE PRODUCT TO USE IN THE PROCEDURE. THEN HE FOUND THAT THE TIP OF THE CATHETER HAD MORE CURLINESS THAN USUAL. THEREFORE, THE PHYSICIAN HAD A CONCERN ABOUT SAFETY OF THE PATIENT. THEY SENT BACK THE PRODUCT TO THE COMPANY FOR INVESTIGATION. THEY COULD NOT FIND IN THE CATALOG THE DETAIL ABOUT THE CURVE DEGREE OF CATHETER TIP BEFORE NOD ADJUST. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 09-OCT-2023. THIS COMPLAINT WAS FOUND BEFORE THE PROCEDURE AT OPENING. THE PRODUCT HAD NOT BEEN USED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 16-NOV-2023. THE DAMAGE RESULTED IN WIRES BEING EXPOSED. USER INSPECTED BY EYE BEFORE INSERTION. CURVE WAS WEIRD MORE THAN AS USUAL AND PHYSICIAN CONCERNED IF CATHETER WAS TO BE INSERTED INTO THE HEART. OR WITH THE CURVE LIKE THIS DURING ABLATION, CURVE WILL NOT BE STABLE AND IT MIGHT TOUCH THE ATRIOVENTRICULAR (AV) NODE. THIS EVENT WAS ORIGINALLY CONSIDERED NON-REPORTABLE, HOWEVER, BWI BECAME AWARE THAT WIRES WERE EXPOSED ON 16-NOV-2023 AND HAVE REA

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18330067 ↗

Other Cardiac ablation percutaneous catheter devices

All Cardiac ablation percutaneous catheter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page