Skip to content

WEBSTER F6QF002RTRecalls & reported problems

Biosense Webster Inc · Class 2

All models of WEBSTER (29)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10846835007961), received between Jun 30, 2019 and Jun 30, 2019 — classified as 1 injury.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Cardiac Tamponade1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 30, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A (B)(6) FEMALE PATIENT ((B)(6)) UNDERWENT AN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AFIB) ABLATION PROCEDURE WITH A NAVISTAR¿ DS ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETER AND A WEBSTER¿ ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETER AND SUFFERED CARDIAC TAMPONADE REQUIRING PERICARDIOCENTESIS. AFTER THE CASE WAS OVER, AND THEY WERE PREPARING TO PULL THE SHEATHS THE PATIENT¿S BLOOD PRESSURE DROPPED, AND CARDIAC TAMPONADE WAS CONFIRMED BY TRANSTHORACIC ECHO (TEE). PERICARDIOCENTESIS WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE 250CC OF FLUID FROM THE PERICARDIAL SPACE. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED IN STABLE CONDITION AFTER PERICARDIAL DRAINAGE. THE PATIENT STAYED AN EXTRA DAY FOR OBSERVATION PURPOSES. PATIENT¿S OUTCOME IS IMPROVED. PHYSICIAN¿S OPINION REGARDING THE CAUSE OF THE ADVERSE EVENT IS THAT IT WAS PROCEDURE-RELATED, PHYSICIAN BELIEVES THE ISSUE WAS CAUSED BY WEBSTER RV CATHETER MANIPULATION NEAR THE END OF THE PROCEDURE, (AFTER THE ABLATION PART OF THE PROCEDURE WAS OVER) DUE TO NON-CAPTURE AND FELT THAT THE REPOSITIONING OF THE RV CATHETER RESULTED IN THE INJURY. HE MENTIONED THAT HE THINKS THIS CATHETER IS STIFFER THAN SOME OTHERS, AND THAT THE PATIENT¿S ANATOMY (THINNER VENTRICLE) MIGHT HAVE ALSO CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EVEN

    Patient problems: Cardiac Tamponade

    MAUDE report 8746943 ↗

Other CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING, OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING devices

All CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING, OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page