NaviStar ThermoCool NI75TCCHRecalls & reported problems
Biosense Webster Inc · Class 3
All models of NaviStar ThermoCool (5)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10846835008357), received between Aug 29, 2022 and Jun 27, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (3 reports).
8 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P030031); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Patient Device Interaction Problem3
- Mechanical Jam1
- Off-Label Use1
Patient problems
- Arrhythmia1
- Chest Pain1
- Dyspnea1
- Fatigue1
- Heart Block1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Paralysis1
- Paresis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 27, 2024Off-Label Use; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Off-Label Use; Patient Device Interaction Problem
THIS COMPLAINT IS FROM A LITERATURE SOURCE. THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE CITE HAS BEEN REVIEWED: KULAKOWSKI P, BARAN J, SIKORSKA A, KRYNSKI T, NIEDZWIEDZ M, SOSZYNSKA M, PIOTROWSKI R. CARDIONEUROABLATION FOR REFLEX ASYSTOLIC SYNCOPE: MID-TERM SAFETY, EFFICACY, AND PATIENT'S ACCEPTANCE. HEART RHYTHM. 2024 MAR;21(3):282-291. DOI: 10.1016/J.HRTHM.2023.11.022. EPUB 2023 NOV 29. PMID: 38036236. OBJECTIVE/METHODS/STUDY DATA: BACKGROUND: CARDIONEUROABLATION (CNA) IS A PROMISING THERAPY FOR REFLEX ASYSTOLIC SYNCOPE; HOWEVER, CONVINCING DATA ON THE MID-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF THIS PROCEDURE ARE LACKING. OBJECTIVE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY WAS TO ASSESS THE MID-TERM SAFETY, EFFICACY, AND PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF CNA. METHODS: THIS PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL SINGLE-CENTER STUDY INCLUDED 115 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS (MEAN AGE 39 ± 13 YEARS; 58% FEMALE) TREATED BETWEEN 2016 AND 2022 WHO COMPLETED AT LEAST 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP. RESULTS: NO SIGNIFICANT PROCEDURE-RELATED ACUTE COMPLICATIONS OCCURRED. DURING MEDIAN FOLLOW-UP OF 28 MONTHS (RANGE 12-75), 95 (83%) REMAINED FREE FROM SYNCOPE. OF THE 20 PATIENTS (17%) WITH SYNCOPE RECURRENCE, SYNCOPE BURDEN DECREASED FROM A MEAN 17 (MEDIAN 6.5) TO 3.75 (MEDIAN 2.5
Patient problems: Arrhythmia; Chest Pain; Dyspnea; Fatigue
MAUDE report 19625850 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
THIS COMPLAINT IS FROM A LITERATURE SOURCE. THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE CITE HAS BEEN REVIEWED: HAN Y, SHAO M, YANG H, SUN H, SANG W, WANG L, WANG L, YANG S, JIAN Y, TANG B, LI Y. SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CARDIONEUROABLATION FOR VAGAL BRADYCARDIA IN A SINGLE ARM PROSPECTIVE STUDY. SCI REP. 2024 MAR 11;14(1):5926. DOI: 10.1038/S41598-024-56651-9. PMID: 38467744; PMCID: PMC10928196. OBJECTIVE/METHODS/STUDY DATA: CARDIONEUROABLATION (CNA) IS CURRENTLY CONSIDERED AS A PROMISING TREATMENT OPTION FOR PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC BRADYCARDIA CAUSED BY VAGOTONIA. THIS STUDY AIMS TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE ITS SAFETY AND EFFICACY IN PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM VAGAL BRADYCARDIA. A TOTAL OF 60 PATIENTS WITH VAGAL BRADYCARDIA WHO UNDERWENT CNA IN THE FIRST AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF XINJIANG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FROM NOVEMBER 2019 TO JUNE 2022. PREOPERATIVE ATROPINE TESTS REVEALED ABNORMAL VAGAL TONE ELEVATION IN ALL PATIENTS. FIRST, THE ELECTROANATOMIC STRUCTURES OF THE LEFT ATRIUM WAS MAPPED OUT BY USING THE CARTO 3 SYSTEM, ACCORDING TO THE PROTOCOL OF PURELY ANATOMY-GUIDED AND LOCAL FRACTIONATED INTRACARDIAC ELECTROGRAM-GUIDED CNA METHODS. THE UPPER LIMIT OF ABLATION POWER OF SUPERIOR LEFT GANGLION (SLGP) AND R
Patient problems: Heart Block
MAUDE report 19618083 ↗MalfunctionJun 6, 2024Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CARDIAC ABLATION PROCEDURE WITH A NAVI-STAR¿ THERMO-COOL¿ ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETER AND THE DEFLECTION MECHANISM WAS STUCK. DURING THE OPERATION, CATHETER WAS UNABLE TO DEFLECT OR RELAX COMPLETELY. A SECOND DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE OPERATION. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT REPORTED ON PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED INDICATED THE CATHETER WAS STUCK IN A DEFLECTED POSITION. THE FAILURE WAS FOUND DURING USE AND THERE WAS NO RING OR ELECTRODE DAMAGE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19481423 ↗InjuryAug 29, 2022Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
THIS COMPLAINT IS FROM A LITERATURE SOURCE. THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE CITATION HAS BEEN REVIEWED: TAKAMATSU S, TACHIBANA M, II N, HASUI Y, MATSUMOTO K, BANBA K. PROPER USE OF FENTANYL FACILITATES ANESTHESIA DURING PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION. HEART VESSELS. 2022 JUN;37(6):1034-1043. DOI: 10.1007/S00380-021-02001-Y. EPUB 2022 JAN 7. PMID: 34993585. OBJECTIVE/METHODS/STUDY DATA: THE AUTHORS AIMED TO CLARIFY THE OPTIMAL FENTANYL DOSAGE AND TIMING OF ADMINISTRATION FOR THE ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT DURING PVI. A TOTAL OF 364 PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF) WHO UNDERWENT PVI AT OUR INSTITUTION BETWEEN JUNE 2017 AND OCTOBER 2020 WERE RECRUITED. ALL PATIENTS WERE ANESTHETIZED WITH PROPOFOL FOR INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE UNDER CONTROLLED VENTILATION VIA THE SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY WITHOUT NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING DRUGS. AMONG THEM, 234 PATIENTS RECEIVED LESS FREQUENT INJECTIONS (GROUP 1) AND 130 RECEIVED A SCHEDULED INJECTION OF 50 MG OF FENTANYL (GROUP 2) IN ADDITION TO PROPOFOL DURING PVI. THE MEAN PATIENT AGE WAS 67.2 YEARS, AND 69% WERE MALE. THE TOTAL PROPOFOL DOSE WAS SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER IN GROUP 2 THAN IN GROUP 1 (17.0¿±¿5.2 MG/KG VS. 19.0¿±¿5.5 MG/KG, P¿<¿0.01). THE LOADING DOSE AND FREQUE
Patient problems: Paralysis; Paresis; Stroke/CVA
MAUDE report 15316210 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P030031. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0169-2023 · Sep 7, 2022 · Open, ClassifiedTHERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF Bi-Directional Navigation Catheter, REF: D-1348-05-S. Used for catheter-based cardiac electrophysiological mapping (stimulation and recording) and, in con
- Z-0139-2015 · Oct 19, 2014 · TerminatedThermoCool SmartTouch Navigation Catheters, Catalog No. D132701, D132702, D132703, D132704, D132705, D133601, D133602, D133603.
- Z-0981-2012 · Nov 22, 2010 · TerminatedEZ Steer ThermoCool Nav Part Number D-1292-03-S Diagnostic/Ablation Catheter instructions for use. The Biosense EZ STEER~ THERMOCOOL~ NAV Diagnostic/Ablation Deflectable Tip Cat
- Z-0983-2012 · Nov 22, 2010 · TerminatedEZ Steer ThermoCool Nav Part Number D-1292-05-S Diagnostic/Ablation Catheter instructions for use. The Biosense EZ STEER~ THERMOCOOL~ NAV Diagnostic/Ablation Deflectable Tip Cat
- Z-0980-2012 · Nov 22, 2010 · TerminatedEZ Steer ThermoCool Nav Part Number D-1292-02-S Diagnostic/Ablation Catheter instructions for use. The Biosense EZ STEER~ THERMOCOOL~ NAV Diagnostic/Ablation Deflectable Tip Cat
- Z-0979-2012 · Nov 22, 2010 · TerminatedEZ Steer ThermoCool Nav Part Number D-1292-01-S Diagnostic/Ablation Catheter instructions for use. The Biosense EZ STEER~ THERMOCOOL~ NAV Diagnostic/Ablation Deflectable Tip Cat
- Z-0982-2012 · Nov 22, 2010 · TerminatedEZ Steer ThermoCool Nav Part Number D-1292-04-S Diagnostic/Ablation Catheter instructions for use. The Biosense EZ STEER~ THERMOCOOL~ NAV Diagnostic/Ablation Deflectable Tip Cat
- Z-0057-06 · Aug 8, 2005 · TerminatedThermocool Irrigated Catheters Celsius LABEL US Part Number# EU CATALOG # L-1189-01-S D17TCBLRT 35Q-13R PMA; L-1189-02-S D17TCDLRT 35Q-33R PMA; L-1189-03-S D17TCFLRT 35Q-53R P
Other catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial flutter devices
- QDOT MICRO D139505Biosense Webster Inc · catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial flutter27 deaths915 reports
- IntellaNav MiFi™ Open-Irrigated M004PMR96200Boston Scientific Corporation · catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial flutter4 deaths269 reports
- QDOT MICRO D139504Biosense Webster Inc · catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial flutter7 deaths138 reports
- Sphere-9™ Catheter AFR-00001Medtronic, Inc. · catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial flutter1 recall5 deaths77 reports
- QDOT MICRO D139401Biosense Webster Inc · catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial flutter2 deaths114 reports
- NaviStar ThermoCool NI75TCDHBiosense Webster Inc · catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial flutter111 reports
- NaviStar RMT ThermoCool NR7TCSIYBiosense Webster Inc · catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial flutter9 deaths103 reports
- IntellaNav MiFi™ Open-Irrigated M004PMR9620K20Boston Scientific Corporation · catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial flutter78 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page