Skip to content

Dover 1614 (UDI 10884521016224)Recalls & reported problems

Cardinal Health, Inc. · Hydrogel Coated Latex Foley Catheter,5 mL, 2-Way · Class 2

All models of Dover (90)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521016224), received between Jan 15, 2020 and Nov 3, 2023 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Failure to Deflate2
  • Deflation Problem1
  • Unintended Deflation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 3, 2023Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED WHEN THEY ATTEMPTED TO INFLATE THE BALLOON, ONLY 6CC'S WERE ABLE TO BE INJECTED, SO THE INFLATION WAS INCOMPLETE. THE USER ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE WATER, BUT WAS NOT ABLE TO. THE USER REMOVED THE PRODUCT BY CUTTING IT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18065914 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 9, 2023Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    CUSTOMER REPORTS: THE PRODUCT WAS USED FOR A GYNECOLOGIC OPERATION. WHEN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE DEVICE FROM THE PATIENT¿S BODY AFTER THE OPERATION, A SYRINGE WAS USED, HOWEVER, IT FAILED TO DRAIN THE STERILIZED WATER FROM THE BALLOON LEFT IN THE BODY. THE INFLATION LUMEN WAS CUT OFF, HOWEVER, IT ALSO DID NOT RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THE PRODUCT WAS FINALLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY WITH THE USE OF A WIRE. IT TOOK 45 MINUTES FOR THIS WHOLE REMOVAL PROCEDURE AFTER THE OPERATION ITSELF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17898552 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 12, 2023Unintended Deflation; Unintended Deflation

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED BEFORE USE, WHEN THE BALLOON WAS INSPECTED, THE WATER LEAKED. NO PATIENT USE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16723845 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 25, 2022Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON WOULD NOT DEFLATE. IT WAS ONLY PLACED LESS THAN 2 HOURS BEFORE THE ATTEMPTED REMOVAL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE INITIAL REPORTER STATED THAT THE PA FINALLY PLACED A GUIDEWIRE INTO THE BALLOON CHANNEL AND DEFLATED IT THEREFORE NO INVASIVE PROCEDURE NEEDED TO DEFLATE THE BALLOON.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15099073 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 24, 2020Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT WHEN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE CATHETER, THE BALLOON WAS UNABLE TO DEFLATE. THEREFORE, CUTTING THE CATHETER WAS REPEATED, AS THE RESULT THE BALLOON DEFLATED, AND THE CATHETER WAS ABLE TO BE REMOVED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10896167 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 15, 2020Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON WAS NOT ABLE TO DEFLATE AND THE CATHETER HAD TO BE CUT IN ORDER TO REMOVE IT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9593312 ↗

Other CATHETER, UROLOGICAL devices

All CATHETER, UROLOGICAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page