Skip to content

Caprosyn SC-587Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Monofilament Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Caprosyn (45)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521034952), received between May 13, 2020 and Aug 22, 2024 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 2 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A THYROIDECTOMY PROCEDURE, WHILE SUTURING, THE THREAD BROKE IN THE MIDDLE. THIS ISSUE OCCURRED ON TWO DEVICES. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, A NEW DEVICE FROM ANOTHER BRAND WAS USED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20027905 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A THYROIDECTOMY PROCEDURE, WHILE SUTURING, THE THREAD BROKE IN THE MIDDLE. THIS ISSUE OCCURRED ON TWO DEVICES. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, A NEW DEVICE FROM ANOTHER BRAND WAS USED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20027312 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 30, 2021Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS CUTICULAR WHILE CLOSURE OF THE SKIN, THE 3 THREADS BROKE INITIALLY ON THE FIRST BITE AND IN BETWEEN. THE SURGEON USED ANOTHER COMPANY'S PRODUCT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12896800 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 13, 2020Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE CAME OFF THE THREAD AND THE SUTURE MATERIAL DISINTEGRATED AND WAS LEFT IN THE PACKAGE. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS OPENED TO COMPLETE THE CASE.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 10053408 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page