Skip to content

Surgipro CP-535Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Monofilament Polypropylene · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Surgipro (62)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521036512), received between Feb 12, 2019 and Jul 25, 2024 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (5 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 3 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Dec 2, 2022Open, Classified

    Sterile Barrier Breach of Breather Pouch may cause infection or vision loss for ophthalmic procedures in cases where there is direct patient contact

    Z-1179-2023 · Root cause: Packaging process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component5
  • Break2
  • Dull, Blunt1
  • Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 25, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE THREAD.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19831035 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 27, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY OF AN OPEN UMBILICAL HERNIA REPAIR, WHEN MOUNTING THE SUTURE ONTO THE NEEDLE HOLDER, TWO SUTURES DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. ANOTHER SUTURE HAD THE SAME ISSUE WHEN THE SURGEON WAS SUTURING TO REPAIR THE UMBILICAL HERNIA. A DIFFERENT SUTURE ALTOGETHER WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19625827 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 27, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY OF AN OPEN UMBILICAL HERNIA REPAIR, WHEN MOUNTING THE SUTURE ONTO THE NEEDLE HOLDER, TWO SUTURES DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. ANOTHER SUTURE HAD THE SAME ISSUE WHEN THE SURGEON WAS SUTURING TO REPAIR THE UMBILICAL HERNIA. A DIFFERENT SUTURE ALTOGETHER WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19625805 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 27, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY OF AN OPEN UMBILICAL HERNIA REPAIR, WHEN MOUNTING THE SUTURE ONTO THE NEEDLE HOLDER, TWO SUTURES DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. ANOTHER SUTURE HAD THE SAME ISSUE WHEN THE SURGEON WAS SUTURING TO REPAIR THE UMBILICAL HERNIA. A DIFFERENT SUTURE ALTOGETHER WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19625777 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 10, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRE-OPERATIVELY, TWO SEPARATE NEEDLES AND THREAD WERE FOUND IN THE SAME SUTURE PACKET. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, USED THREE ADDITIONAL SUTURES FROM THE SAME LOT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16350161 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 6, 2021Break; Dull, Blunt; Break; Dull, Blunt

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING CLOSURE OF AN OPEN PROSTATECTOMY, WHILE USING A KNOT TYING TECHNIQUE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE NEEDLE WAS BLUNT AND BROKEN. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11624763 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 12, 2019Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC HERNIA SURGERY, THE FIRST SUTURE BROKE WHILE SEWING AND THE SECOND SUTURE BROKE WHILE TYING THE KNOT. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8331527 ↗

Other SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYPROPYLENE devices

All SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYPROPYLENE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page