Skip to content

Surgipro ll VP-875-XRecalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Monofilament Polypropylene · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Surgipro ll (70)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521039469), received between May 13, 2021 and Jul 12, 2021 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Dec 2, 2022Class IIOpen, Classified

    Sterile Barrier Breach of Breather Pouch may cause infection or vision loss for ophthalmic procedures in cases where there is direct patient contact

    Z-1180-2023 · Root cause: Packaging process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2021Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, WHEN IN VESSEL ANASTOMOSIS ON AN OPEN PROCEDURE, THE THREAD OF SEVERAL DEVICES BROKE. THE DEFECT WAS SEEN ON TWO DIFFERENT MODEL NUMBER. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, THE SURGEON USED A DEVICE WITH A DIFFERENT SIZE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12151121 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 13, 2021Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE SUTURE BROKE DURING VESSEL ANASTOMOSIS IN CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING PROCEDURE. ANOTHER SUTURE FROM DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11823352 ↗

Other SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYPROPYLENE devices

All SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYPROPYLENE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page