Skip to content

Polysorb CL-906Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Braided Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Polysorb (291)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521043282), received between May 9, 2019 and May 20, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K963253, K981935); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break5
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2

Patient problems

  • Radiation Exposure, Unintended3
  • No Code Available2
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Fever1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Sepsis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 20, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE BROKE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19356466 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 16, 2023Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING CESAREAN SECTION, WHEN SUTURING THE TISSUE, THE NEEDLE OF THE SIX SUTURES BROKE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16385460 ↗
  • InjuryDec 26, 2019Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY, WHILE SUTURING THE UTERUS, THE SURGEON THOUGHT THAT THE NEEDLE WAS BLUNT, HOWEVER ON CLOSE INSPECTION THE TIP WAS MISSING. AN ON-CALL CONSULTANT WAS CALLED IN AND PERFORMED AN ABDOMINAL AND PELVIC X-RAY TO MAKE SURE THAT THE TIP HAD NOT FALLEN INTO BODY, WHICH WAS NOT FOUND. SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED BY 30 MINUTES DUE TO THE PRODUCT CONDITION. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS OPENED TO COMPLETE THE CASE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; No Code Available; Radiation Exposure, Unintended

    MAUDE report 9519660 ↗
  • InjuryDec 22, 2019Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, AT THE BEGINNING OF A CESAREAN SECTION, THE TIP OF THE SUTURE NEEDLE WAS NOTED TO BE MISSING. ABDOMINAL X-RAY WAS PERFORMED ON THE TABLE PRE-CLOSURE AND NO TIP WAS VISUALIZED.

    Patient problems: Radiation Exposure, Unintended

    MAUDE report 9508715 ↗
  • InjuryMay 9, 2019Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, WHILE CLOSING THE SECOND LAYER OF THE UTERUS DURING CESAREAN SECTION, THE NEEDLE FELT BLUNT AS THE SURGEON WAS COMING TOWARDS THE END OF THE SECOND LAYER. IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE TIP WAS MISSING, THEY HAD TO PERFORM 2 X-RAYS TO SEE IF THEY COULD LOCATE THE TIP OF THE NEEDLE, BUT THEY WERE UNABLE TO IDENTIFY AND AS SUCH HAVE ORDERED A PATIENT MRI TO BE PERFORMED AFTER THE 48 HOURS AS RECOMMENDED BY CONSULTANT RADIOLOGIST. THE INCIDENCE RESULTED IN THE PATIENT HAVING A PROLONGED PERIOD OF 4 HOURS WHERE THE ABDOMEN WAS OPEN AND REQUIRED CONTINUOUS ANALGESIA. POST OPERATIVELY THE PATIENT HAD PYREXIA AND AS SUCH HAS BEEN TREATED FOR SEPSIS.

    Patient problems: Fever; Foreign Body In Patient; No Code Available; Radiation Exposure, Unintended; Sepsis

    MAUDE report 8597598 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K963253, K981935. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2601-2018 · Jun 15, 2018 · Terminated
    Polysorb Braided Absorbable Suture 1 36" 90 cm Undyed GS-21, Product Number CL-955
  • Z-2541-2017 · May 3, 2017 · Terminated
    Sutures. POLYSORB: POLSORB 0 18 U/D PRECUT 126R, Item Number: L4; POLSORB 0 18 VIO PRECUT 226T; Item Number: L14; POLSORB 0 30 VIO PRECUT 227C, Item Number: L404; POLSORB 1 18 VI

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page