Polysorb GL-128Recalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · Braided Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Polysorb (291)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521045026), received between Jul 19, 2018 and Mar 6, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K963253, K981935); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break5
- Detachment of Device or Device Component4
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Insufficient Information2
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
- No Code Available1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Radiation Exposure, Unintended1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 6, 2023Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, WHEN APONEUROSIS WAS CLOSED, THE NEEDLE HAD BROKE. THE REMAINS OF THE NEEDLE WERE OUTSIDE THE PATIENT¿S CAVITY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16491739 ↗MalfunctionMar 6, 2023Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, WHEN APONEUROSIS WAS CLOSED, THE NEEDLE HAD BROKE. THE REMAINS OF THE NEEDLE WERE OUTSIDE THE PATIENT¿S CAVITY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16491615 ↗MalfunctionMar 6, 2023Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, WHEN APONEUROSIS WAS CLOSED, THE NEEDLE HAD BROKE. THE REMAINS OF THE NEEDLE WERE OUTSIDE THE PATIENT¿S CAVITY. A COMPETITOR SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16486742 ↗MalfunctionJun 18, 2021Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CAESAREAN SECTION, ON A CROSS STITCH SUTURE ON THE UTERINE MUSCLE FOR HEMOSTASIS OF NOT MORE THAN 500CC, THE NEEDLE BROKE. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12024560 ↗InjuryNov 14, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING GYNECOLOGIC EPISIOTOMY, NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE THREAD. AN X-RAY WAS PERFORMED TO LOCATE/CONFIRM ALL PIECES WERE FOUND. SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED BY 1 HOUR AND 30 MINUTES AS A RESULT OF THE SEARCH AND TIME NEEDED FOR CLOSURE.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Radiation Exposure, Unintended
MAUDE report 9322499 ↗MalfunctionJul 19, 2018Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, BOTH NEEDLE AND THREAD BROKE DURING CAESAREAN SECTION. NEW SUTURE WAS TAKEN TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE AND TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7703526 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K963253, K981935. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2601-2018 · Jun 15, 2018 · TerminatedPolysorb Braided Absorbable Suture 1 36" 90 cm Undyed GS-21, Product Number CL-955
- Z-2541-2017 · May 3, 2017 · TerminatedSutures. POLYSORB: POLSORB 0 18 U/D PRECUT 126R, Item Number: L4; POLSORB 0 18 VIO PRECUT 226T; Item Number: L14; POLSORB 0 30 VIO PRECUT 227C, Item Number: L404; POLSORB 1 18 VI
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page