Skip to content

Polysorb GL-224Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Braided Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521045163), received between Jan 12, 2018 and Jan 16, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (7 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K963253, K981935); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 2 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break7
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Bent1
  • Detachment Of Device Component1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Adhesion(s)1
  • Bacterial Infection1
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • No Information1
  • Peritonitis1
  • Thrombosis/Thrombus1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 16, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY PROCEDURE, TWO DEVICES SUTURE WERE BROKEN. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18523254 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 16, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY PROCEDURE, TWO DEVICES SUTURE WERE BROKEN. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18523234 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 13, 2023Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PREOPERATIVELY, TWO NEEDLES WERE IN A SHUTTLE THAT SHOULD ONLY CONTAIN ONE. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17936590 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 23, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POSTOPERATIVE TO ROUTINE VETERINARY OVARIECTOMY WHERE SUTURE WAS USED TO LIGATE BOTH OVARIAN PEDICLES AND CRANIAL UTERINE HORNS, THE LABRADOR DEVELOPED A SEPTIC PERITONITIS AND AN EXPLORATORY LAPAROTOMY WAS PERFORMED FOUR DAYS AFTER THE INITIAL SURGERY DUE TO CLINICAL DETERIORATION. SIGNIFICANT TISSUE ADHESIONS WERE PRESENT AND BLUNT DISSECTION RESULTED IN SIGNIFICANT TRAUMA TO THE DISTAL AORTA/PROXIMAL RIGHT ILIAC ARTERY, RESULTING IN PATIENT HAVING POST-THROMBOTIC SYNDROME ON THE TABLE. THE FOCUS OF SUPPURATIVE INFLAMMATORY REACTIONS APPEARED TO BE AT BOTH OVARIAN PEDICLES AND IN THE DISTAL RIGHT INGUINAL AREA. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS UTILIZED FOR LINEA ALBA ABDOMINAL WALL CLOSURE (NO REACTION). ABDOMINAL FLUID SAMPLES OBTAINED AT EXPLORATORY LAPAROTOMY CONFIRMED BACTERIAL INFECTION. POST-MORTEM FAILED TO IDENTIFY ANY OTHER CAUSE OTHER THAN IATROGENIC BREAK IN ASEPSIS DURING NEUTERING.

    Patient problems: Adhesion(s); Bacterial Infection; Peritonitis; Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 16431570 ↗
  • InjuryJun 23, 2019Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A DEEP SUTURE ON AN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR, THE NEEDLE BROKE IN THE TISSUES AND THE BROKEN PIECE FELL INTO THE PATIENT¿S CAVITY.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; No Information; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8725659 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 2, 2018Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING FASCIA CLOSURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE. THE SURGEON REALIZED THAT THE NEEDLE WAS BROKEN AT ITS END AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE 2ND POINT. A PIECE OF THE NEEDLE WAS AT THE OPERATIVE SITE. REMOVING THE NEEDLE PIECE FROM THE SURGICAL SITE AND USING ANOTHER WIRE FOR THE REST OF THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8123165 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 7, 2018Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE NEEDLE TIP SNAPPED OFF DURING A PROCEDURE. THEY FOUND IT ON THE DRAPE AND DISCARDED SAFELY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7855593 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2018Bent; Break; Detachment Of Device Component; Bent; Break; Detachment Of Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, THE SUTURE NEEDLE BENDS EASILY AND IT BROKE. A PORTION OF THE SUTURE NEEDLE FELL INTO THE PATIENT CAVITY AND THEY WERE ABLE TO COMPLETELY RETRIEVE THE BROKEN PIECE FROM THE PATIENT¿S CAVITY. THEY NOTED THAT THIS EVENT RESULTED IN SIGNIFICANT TIME LOSS AND IT MADE IT HARDER TO COMPLETE THE SUTURING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7533093 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 12, 2018Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING SUTURING ON C-SECTION PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE'S NEEDLE AND THREAD WAS BROKE. NO PATIENT INJURY HAS BEEN NOTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7187471 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K963253, K981935. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2601-2018 · Jun 15, 2018 · Terminated
    Polysorb Braided Absorbable Suture 1 36" 90 cm Undyed GS-21, Product Number CL-955
  • Z-2541-2017 · May 3, 2017 · Terminated
    Sutures. POLYSORB: POLSORB 0 18 U/D PRECUT 126R, Item Number: L4; POLSORB 0 18 VIO PRECUT 226T; Item Number: L14; POLSORB 0 30 VIO PRECUT 227C, Item Number: L404; POLSORB 1 18 VI

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page