Skip to content

Monosof SN-5667Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Monofilament Nylon · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Monosof (89)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521078796), received between Dec 26, 2019 and Oct 15, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K900531); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Skin Inflammation/ Irritation1
  • Unintended Radiation Exposure1
  • Unspecified Tissue Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE WAS DAMAGED ON THE MIDDLE PART. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23288088 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 5, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRIOR TO USE, JUST ON LOADING THE SUTURE, THE NEEDLE AND SUTURE MATERIAL BROKE OFF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19467817 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 19, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON HAD THE SUTURE BREAK WHEN TRYING TO USE IT. OPENED ANOTHER PACK AND WHEN TAKING SUTURE OUT OF PACK IT BROKE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18544187 ↗
  • InjuryOct 13, 2022Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN GENDER AFFIRMING BILATERAL MASTECTOMY WITH FREE NIPPLE GRAFT, WHILE SUTURING IN THE DRAIN, THE NEEDLE WAS PASSED THROUGH THE SKIN. AS THE USER WAS GRASPING THE NEEDLE TO PULL THRU, THE NEEDLE BROKE AND FLEW THROUGH THE AIR. THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE NEEDLE. AN X-RAY WAS PERFORMED TO CONFIRM THE BROKEN NEEDLE WAS NOT IN THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Unintended Radiation Exposure

    MAUDE report 15601498 ↗
  • InjuryJan 14, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POST-OPERATIVELY OF AN OPEN OSTEOTOMY OF THE 1ST AND 5TH METATARSAL WHERE THE DEVICES WERE USED FOR CLOSING USING THE INTERRUPTED SUTURING TECHNIQUE, THE INCISION LINES WERE EXTREMELY INFLAMED. THE TISSUE WAS DAMAGED. ANTIBIOTICS WERE USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: Skin Inflammation/ Irritation; Unspecified Tissue Injury

    MAUDE report 13261403 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 26, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING CLOSURE OF SKIN IN A OPEN PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE CAME OFF THE THREAD. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9519350 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K900531. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1173-2023 · Dec 2, 2022 · Open, Classified
    Monofilament Nylon Suture (McKesson Branded) and Coated Braided Silk Suture (McKesson Branded) (1) S661GX 5-0 NYLON 18 DS18 (2)S683GX 4-0 SILK 18 DS18 (3) S683GX
  • Z-1174-2023 · Dec 2, 2022 · Open, Classified
    Monosof Monofilament Nylon sutures: Product Description CN-724 MONOSOF* 1 BLK 100CM GS25 X36 CN-791 MONOSOF* 2-0 BLK 100CM GCC90X36 CN-791-12 MONOSOF* 2-0 BLK 10

Other SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYAMIDE devices

All SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYAMIDE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page