MAHURKAR Elite 8888222216Recalls & reported problems
Mozarc Medical US LLC · Acute Dual Lumen Catheter Kit,Curved Extensions,12 Fr/Ch (4.0 mm) x 16 cm · Class 2
All models of MAHURKAR Elite (64)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521125834), received between Nov 3, 2020 and Aug 1, 2025 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Puncture/Hole” (2 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K120674); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Puncture/Hole2
- Difficult to Remove1
- Infusion or Flow Problem1
- Material Frayed1
- Premature Indicator Activation1
- Protective Measures Problem1
- Unraveled Material1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 1, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, WHEN INSERTING THE GUIDEWIRE, IT GETS STUCK IN THE CATHETER. THE CATHETER WAS NOT REPAIRED. THERE WAS NO LEAK. TEGO WAS NOT UTILIZED. THERE WAS NO LUER ADAPTER ISSUE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT OUTCOME.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 22690157 ↗MalfunctionApr 28, 2025Unraveled Material; Premature Indicator Activation; Unraveled Material; Premature Indicator Activation
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRAOPERATIVELY, INSTEAD OF THE INCLUDED 18G PUNCTURE NEEDLE, ANOTHER 18G CANNULA NEEDLE WAS PREPARED AND USED TO PUNCTURE IT. HOWEVER, THE GUIDEWIRE DID NOT PASS THROUGH, SO A 16G CANNULA NEEDLE WAS USED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED. THE GUIDEWIRE PASSED THROUGH THE CANNULA NEEDLE, BUT IT DID NOT COME OUT ANYMORE. WHEN A SMALL AMOUNT OF FORCE WAS APPLIED TO PULL IT OUT, THE COILED GUIDEWIRE WAS DAMAGED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21917755 ↗MalfunctionSep 8, 2022Protective Measures Problem; Protective Measures Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, WHEN THE CATHETER WAS PLACED AND THE DIALYSIS WAS STARTED, A DEFECT EVENT OCCURRED IN WHICH BLOOD LEAKED (UNKNOWN ML) FROM THE CATHETER INSERTION/PUNCTURE SITE. IT WAS SAID THAT THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY OF CATHETER DAMAGE (MALFUNCTION) AT THE SUBCUTANEOUS PLACEMENT SITE OF THE CATHETER. THE CATHETER TIP HAD BEEN CUT IN THE HOSPITAL IN ORDER TO BE USED FOR CULTURE. IT WAS SAID THAT THE IMPLANT DATE OF THE REPORTED CATHETER WAS SAME WITH THE EVENT DATE. NOTHING UNUSUAL WAS OBSERVED ON THE DEVICE PRIOR TO USE. THE CATHETER WAS NOT REPAIRED. NO CLEANING AGENT WAS USED ON THE DEVICE. TEGO WAS NOT UTILIZED. THERE WAS NO LUER ADAPTER ISSUE. FLUSHING WAS DONE PRIOR TO USE WITH NORMAL RESULTS. NO OTHER PRODUCTS WERE BEING UTILIZED WITH THE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO BLOOD TRANSFUSION REQUIRED. IT WAS SAID THAT THE PATIENT HAD CATHETER REMOVAL TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE AND WAS NOT REPLACED. TREATMENT WAS NOT COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15379950 ↗MalfunctionJan 18, 2021Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING TREATMENT (AFTER PLACING A SAMPLE IN THE RIGHT INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN), A CRACK LIKE CRUSHING WAS FOUND NEAR THE CURVE OF THE A SIDE BRANCH TUBE BUT IT WAS JUDGED ON THE SPOT THAT THERE WAS NO INFLUENCE, SO IT WAS NOW STILL IN USE. NO PROBLEM SUCH AS LEAKAGE HAD OCCURRED SO FAR. NO PROBLEMS HAVE OCCURRED SINCE THE IMPLANTATION. IT WAS SAID THAT AT THE SAME TIME OF THE EVENT, THEY OPENED AND CHECKED ANOTHER PRODUCT (SECOND PRODUCT, NOT USED) FROM THE SAME LOT JUST TO BE SURE AND THE SAME PROBLEM (CRACK LIKE CRUSHING) WAS FOUND NEAR THE CURVE OF THE A SIDE BRANCH TUBE. THE CATHETER WAS NOT REPAIRED. NOTHING UNUSUAL OBSERVED PRIOR TO USE. NO OTHER PRODUCTS BEING UTILIZED WITH THE DEVICE. THE CLAMP WAS NOT MOVED PERIODICALLY. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION/TREATMENT DUE TO THE EVENT. TREATMENT WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT OUTCOME.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 11187773 ↗MalfunctionJan 18, 2021Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING TREATMENT (AFTER PLACING A SAMPLE IN THE RIGHT INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN), A CRACK LIKE CRUSHING WAS FOUND NEAR THE CURVE OF THE A SIDE BRANCH TUBE BUT IT WAS JUDGED ON THE SPOT THAT THERE WAS NO INFLUENCE, SO IT WAS NOW STILL IN USE. NO PROBLEM SUCH AS LEAKAGE HAD OCCURRED SO FAR. NO PROBLEMS HAVE OCCURRED SINCE THE IMPLANTATION. IT WAS SAID THAT AT THE SAME TIME OF THE EVENT, THEY OPENED AND CHECKED ANOTHER PRODUCT (SECOND PRODUCT, NOT USED) FROM THE SAME LOT JUST TO BE SURE AND THE SAME PROBLEM (CRACK LIKE CRUSHING) WAS FOUND NEAR THE CURVE OF THE A SIDE BRANCH TUBE. THE CATHETER WAS NOT REPAIRED. NOTHING UNUSUAL OBSERVED PRIOR TO USE. NO OTHER PRODUCTS BEING UTILIZED WITH THE DEVICE. THE CLAMP WAS NOT MOVED PERIODICALLY. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION/TREATMENT DUE TO THE EVENT. TREATMENT WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT OUTCOME.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 11186373 ↗MalfunctionNov 3, 2020Material Frayed; Infusion or Flow Problem; Material Frayed; Infusion or Flow Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE CATHETER HAD FLOW PROBLEMS, USUALLY AFTER SECOND DIALYSIS THE CATHETER WAS NOT ABLE TO USE, LEADING TO FREQUENT CHANGES EVERY TWO DIALYSIS ON AVERAGE. THE GUIDE WIRE WAS NOT RIGID, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO PASS, IN ADDITION TO RUPTURE IN THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10776987 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K120674. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2319-2026 · Apr 29, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedMahurkar Elite PASS Trays; Description (Product Number/CFN): 12 FR x 13cm Acute Dual Lumen Catheter with Straight Extensions, PASS Tray (8888221413), 12 FR x 16cm Acute Dual Lumen
- Z-1007-2018 · Oct 14, 2017 · TerminatedMAHURKAR"* Elite 12 FR x 16cm Acute Dual Lumen Dialysis Catheter with Curved Extensions, IC Trays. Product Number: 8888222316.
Other CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED devices
- MAHURKAR 8888135191Mozarc Medical US LLC · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED1 recall175 reports
- MAHURKAR 8888135241Mozarc Medical US LLC · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED1 recall1 death100 reports
- ARROW IPN036723Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls2 reports
- ARROW IPN036412Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls1 report
- DuoGlide catheter 5625240Bard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls1 report
- ARROW IPN036428Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls0 reports
- ARROW IPN036419Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls0 reports
- ARROW IPN927343Teleflex Incorporated · Catheter, hemodialysis, non-implanted2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page