Skip to content

V-Loc 180 VLOCL0023Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Absorbable Wound Closure Device,P-12,1x Clear Strand · Class 2 · Implant

All models of V-Loc 180 (61)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Quick summary

This Covidien V-Loc 180 absorbable suture is an implantable wound-closure device. The 41 adverse event reports mostly describe the suture or needle breaking or detaching during surgery, with two reports mentioning wound reopening; there were no deaths and 2 injuries. There is 1 open recall, started June 2026, over possibly torn sterile packaging that could contaminate the sutures.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
41
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 41 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521130401), received between Oct 30, 2017 and Apr 2, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 39 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (31 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 4 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 24, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified

    Product may contain a perforation or tear in the sterile barrier packaging. This issue may result in biocontamination of the sterile sutures, which may lead to infection, loss of vision if in ophthalmic utilization, or prolonged surgery.

    Z-2919-2026 · Root cause: Equipment maintenance · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break31
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component11
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions15
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient12
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient10
  • Wound Dehiscence2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 41 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 2, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A THYROIDECTOMY, WHEN THE SCRUB NURSE COUNTED THE SUTURE NEEDLES, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE NEEDLE AND SUTURE WERE DETACHED AND BROKEN. THE SUTURE WAS IMMEDIATELY REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE AND USE CONTINUED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24769457 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 29, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CESAREAN SECTION, WHILE SUTURING THE SUBCUTANEOUS, THE NEEDLE DETACHED, BUT IT DID NOT FALL INTO THE PATIENT¿S CAVITY. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22645367 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 30, 2025Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A DERMAL BURIED SUTURE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE BROKE WHILE SUTURING. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, A NEW DEVICE WAS USED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22119726 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 4, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, A SUTURE WAS USED TO SUTURE THE JOINT CAPSULE AND SKIN; THE THREAD OF THE TWO SUTURES BROKE. THE SURGEON USED ANOTHER THREAD TO SUTURE AGAIN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20371669 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 20, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROTOMY, THE SUTURE WAS CUT WHEN TENSION WAS APPLIED DURING THE SUTURE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19353960 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 22, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A ARTIFICIAL HIP JOINT REPLACEMENT, THE SUTURE BROKE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19154633 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 22, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A ARTIFICIAL HIP JOINT REPLACEMENT, THE SUTURE BROKE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19154560 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 22, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A ARTIFICIAL HIP JOINT REPLACEMENT, THE SUTURE BROKE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19153767 ↗
  • InjuryApr 15, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POST-OPERATIVE A ARTIFICIAL HIP JOINT REPLACEMENT, A WOUND DISSECTION OCCURRED, REQUIRING ADDITIONAL SUTURE.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 19107032 ↗
  • InjuryAug 29, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A WOUND OR SURGICAL INCISION CLOSURE AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION, WOUND DEHISCENCE OCCURRED WITH THE DERMAL SUTURE. THIS EVENT OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH AFTER THE SURGERY. NO SUTURE BREAKAGE OCCURRED. LAPAROTOMY WAS PERFORMED. ABDOMEN WAS NOT OPENED, BUT ANOTHER DERMAL SUTURE WAS DONE TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 17646670 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 14, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN MAMMOPLASTY, AT THE TIME OF SKIN SUTURING, WHEN THE PACKAGE WAS OPENED, THE THREAD WAS DISENGAGED FROM THE NEEDLE. A NEW SUTURE WAS OPENED AND USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15788860 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 20, 2022Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING SUTURE OPERATION, THE THREAD BROKE. ANOTHER SUTURE THREAD WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE AND RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15066073 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 3, 2022Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CAESARIAN SECTION PROCEDURE, WHILE CLOSING INCISION AND SUTURING DERMAL, THE NEEDLE GOT BROKE. A NEW PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE AND RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14598634 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 19, 2021Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, WHEN CLOSING THE INCISION DURING AN EXPLORATORY LAPAROSCOPY, THE SUTURE BROKE. THE USED ANOTHER SUTURE WITH THE SAME LOT NUMBER AND BROKE AGAIN.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12843141 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 7, 2021Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN ARTIFICIAL JOINT REPLACEMENT, WHEN THE SUTURE WAS OPENED, THE THREAD WAS BROKEN SO IT WAS NOT USED AND A NEW PRODUCT WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12764375 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 14, 2021Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER DURING AN OPEN BREAST CANCER SURGERY, WHILE ON WOUND CLOSURE, THE SUTURE THREAD GOT EASILY BROKEN WHILE USING THE HORIZONTAL MATTRESS SUTURING TECHNIQUE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED AND OPENED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE IS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12468006 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 21, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, THE THREAD CAME OFF FROM THE PROXIMAL END OF THE NEEDLE DURING THE STITCH. A NEW PRODUCT WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12207157 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 27, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, ON A CAESAREAN PROCEDURE, DURING DERMAL SUTURING FOR INCISION CLOSURE, THE NEEDLE AND THREAD DISENGAGED. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11236450 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 14, 2020Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE THREAD OF THE SUTURE BROKE IMMEDIATELY. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10406973 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 17, 2020Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRAOPERATIVELY, THE NEEDLE KEPT BREAKING OFF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10165896 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 10, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, WHEN THE PRODUCT WAS OPENED DURING A PROCEDURE FOR ENDOSCOPIC CONTROL OF DUODENAL ULCER, THE NURSE ATTEMPTED TO HOLD THE NEEDLE WITH A NEEDLE HOLDER, BUT THE THREAD AND THE NEEDLE DISENGAGED. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED ON THE PATIENT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9687287 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 15, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, ON A LAPAROSCOPIC LOWER ANTERIOR RESECTION, WHEN SUTURING WITH TRANSANAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (TAMIS), THE THREAD CAME OFF THE SWAGE. THE THREAD WAS CUT OFF AND ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9327573 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 24, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, ON AN EMERGENCY EXPLORATORY SURGERY, DURING THE 1ST SUTURING, THE THREAD DISENGAGED FROM THE NEEDLE WHILE LIFTING IT FROM THE PACKAGE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9111409 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 12, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, ON A LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY, WHILE SUTURING, THE DOCTOR HELD AND LIFTED THE THREAD WITH FORCEPS, HOWEVER THERE WAS NO NEEDLE AT THE TIP OF THE THREAD. IT WAS STATED THAT THE NEEDLE FELL INTO THE PATIENT¿S CAVITY AND WAS RETRIEVED. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9008125 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2019Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, WHEN CLOSING A SURGICAL INCISION WITH SUTURE IN AN OPEN SURGERY, THE THREAD BROKE OFF. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8920823 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page