V-Loc 180 VLOCL0306Recalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · Absorbable Wound Closure Device · Class 2 · Implant
All models of V-Loc 180 (61)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 14
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 14 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521130944), received between Oct 15, 2019 and Dec 25, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 10 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (9 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Jun 24, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified
Product may contain a perforation or tear in the sterile barrier packaging. This issue may result in biocontamination of the sterile sutures, which may lead to infection, loss of vision if in ophthalmic utilization, or prolonged surgery.
Z-2919-2026 · Root cause: Equipment maintenance · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break9
- Detachment of Device or Device Component5
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding3
- Pain3
- No Information2
- Hematoma1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Unintended Radiation Exposure1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 14 most recent of 14 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 25, 2025Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE, PRIOR TO PATIENT USE, THERE WAS NO LOOP AT THE END OF THE SUTURE UPON OPENING. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23894359 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY PROCEDURE, WHILE SUTURING THE 3 SUTURES IN THE CASE BROKE IN THE MIDDLE. ANOTHER SUTURE FROM A DIFFERENT BATCH WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23838619 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY PROCEDURE, WHILE SUTURING THE (B)(4) SUTURES IN THE CASE BROKE IN THE MIDDLE. ANOTHER SUTURE FROM A DIFFERENT BATCH WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23838594 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY, WHILE CLOSING THE SEROSAL LAYER OF THE UTERUS, THE SUTURE BROKE IN THE MIDDLE. AN ADDITIONAL NEW SUTURE WAS USED WITHOUT ISSUE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23725777 ↗MalfunctionNov 15, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY PROCEDURE, WHILE SUTURING THE 12 SUTURES IN THE CASE BROKE IN THE MIDDLE. ANOTHER SUTURE FROM A DIFFERENT BATCH WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23563932 ↗MalfunctionAug 6, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A ROBOTIC LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY, WHILE SUTURING, THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE STRAND. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19919068 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2024Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POSTOPERATIVELY, THE THREAD BROKE. THE PATIENT CAME BACK AFTER HAVING HAD A LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY AND STARTED TO HAVE PAIN AND BLEEDING SEVERAL WEEKS AFTER THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT HAD TO BE REOPERATED DUE TO BREAKAGE OF VAGINAL CLOSURE, ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain
MAUDE report 19320892 ↗InjuryMay 9, 2024Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POSTOPERATIVELY, THE THREAD BROKE. THE PATIENT CAME BACK AFTER HAVING HAD A LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY AND STARTED TO HAVE PAIN AND BLEEDING SEVERAL WEEKS AFTER THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT HAD TO BE REOPERATED DUE TO BREAKAGE OF VAGINAL CLOSURE, ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain
MAUDE report 19280369 ↗InjuryMay 1, 2024Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POSTOPERATIVELY, THE THREAD BROKE. THE PATIENT CAME BACK AFTER HAVING HAD A LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY AND STARTED TO HAVE PAIN AND BLEEDING SEVERAL WEEKS AFTER THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT HAD TO BE RE-OPERATED DUE TO BREAKAGE OF VAGINAL CLOSURE, ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain
MAUDE report 19221402 ↗MalfunctionMar 17, 2023Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A ROBOTIC LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL (TAPP) PROCEDURE, WHILE HERNIA SUTURING, THE THREAD BROKE WHILE PULLING THE THIRD THROW OF A RUNNING SUTURE. THE NEEDLE WAS LOCATED SAFELY AND REMOVED FROM THE ABDOMEN. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE ABSORBABLE SUTURE WAS OPENED OR REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGING 15-20 MINUTES PRIOR TO USE. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16564697 ↗MalfunctionNov 5, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE DEVICE'S NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE THREAD.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 10796135 ↗InjuryOct 26, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE LITERATURE SOURCE OF STUDY, 203 PATIENTS UNDERWENT MYOMECTOMY BY TWO SPECIALISTS BETWEEN 2014 AND 2017. 110 WOMEN UNDERWENT LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY, AND 93 WOMEN UNDERWENT ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY. IN ALL PROCEDURES, THE LIGASURE WAS USED TO MAKE A LINE INTO THE MYOMETRIUM AND DEEPENED UNTIL THE MYOMA SURFACE APPEARED. AFTER THE MYOMA WAS REMOVED, THE LIGASURE WAS USED TO SEPARATE THE CAPSULE FROM THE MYOMA. THE MYOMETRIAL WOUND WAS REPAIRED USING V-LOC. SEVEN DAYS POST-OPERATIVELY, SIX PATIENTS DEVELOPED A HEMATOMA, ONE OF WHICH ALSO HAD A PELVIC INFECTION THAT NEEDED CT-GUIDED DRAINAGE OF THE HEMATOMA AND ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT.
Patient problems: Hematoma; Unintended Radiation Exposure; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 10733305 ↗MalfunctionSep 30, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY, UPON OPENING OF PACKAGING IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE NEEDLE WAS NOT ATTACHED TO THE THREAD.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 10605038 ↗MalfunctionOct 15, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE DEVICE NEEDLE AND THREAD SEPARATED WHILE USING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9195087 ↗
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page