Skip to content

V-Loc 180 VLOCL0345Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Absorbable Wound Closure Device · Class 2 · Implant

All models of V-Loc 180 (61)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
17
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 17 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521131040), received between Nov 8, 2017 and Sep 29, 2026 — classified as 17 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unraveled Material” (10 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 2 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 2 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 10 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202610
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 24, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified

    Product may contain a perforation or tear in the sterile barrier packaging. This issue may result in biocontamination of the sterile sutures, which may lead to infection, loss of vision if in ophthalmic utilization, or prolonged surgery.

    Z-2919-2026 · Root cause: Equipment maintenance · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Unraveled Material10
  • Break5
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2

Patient problems

  • Wound Dehiscence10
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • Tissue Breakdown5
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 17 most recent of 17 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 29, 2026Unraveled Material

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 50935124 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 29, 2026Unraveled Material

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 50935115 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 29, 2026Unraveled Material

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 50935103 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 29, 2026Unraveled Material

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 50935083 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 29, 2026Unraveled Material

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 50935033 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Unraveled Material

    Patient problems: Tissue Breakdown; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 50926070 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Unraveled Material

    Patient problems: Tissue Breakdown; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 50926056 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Unraveled Material

    Patient problems: Tissue Breakdown; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 50926041 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Unraveled Material

    Patient problems: Tissue Breakdown; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 50926012 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Unraveled Material

    Patient problems: Tissue Breakdown; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 50926000 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 2, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, WHILE CLOSING OF THE VAGINA TOP, THE TWO SUTURES BROKE WHILE SUTURING. AN ADDITIONAL NEW SUTURE WAS USED WITHOUT ISSUE. THE SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED BY 5 MINUTES. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23952212 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 2, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, WHILE CLOSING OF THE VAGINA TOP, THE TWO SUTURES BROKE WHILE SUTURING. AN ADDITIONAL NEW SUTURE WAS USED WITHOUT ISSUE. THE SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED BY 5 MINUTES. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23952197 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 12, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRAOPERATIVELY, THE NEEDLE ON THE TWO SUTURE THREAD CAME RIGHT OFF WHEN IT WAS PULLED THROUGH THE TISSUE. MORE SUTURES WERE OPENED FROM ANOTHER BOX WITH ANOTHER LOT NUMBER TO FIX THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22005702 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 12, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRAOPERATIVELY, THE NEEDLE ON THE TWO SUTURE THREAD CAME RIGHT OFF WHEN IT WAS PULLED THROUGH THE TISSUE. MORE SUTURES WERE OPENED FROM ANOTHER BOX WITH ANOTHER LOT NUMBER TO FIX THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22005525 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY PROCEDURE, WHILE CLOSING THE VAGINAL STUMP, AFTER PULLING THE NEEDLE THROUGH THE LOOP (THE NEEDLE WAS STILL IN THE NEEDLE HOLDER), THE SUTURE BROKE APPROXIMATELY FIVE CENTIMETERS BEHIND THE NEEDLE. A SECOND SUTURE ALSO BROKE DURING THE SAME EVENT. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, A THIRD SUTURE FROM THE SAME BATCH WAS USED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18862676 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY PROCEDURE, WHILE CLOSING THE VAGINAL STUMP, AFTER PULLING THE NEEDLE THROUGH THE LOOP (THE NEEDLE WAS STILL IN THE NEEDLE HOLDER), THE SUTURE BROKE APPROXIMATELY FIVE CENTIMETERS BEHIND THE NEEDLE. A SECOND SUTURE ALSO BROKE DURING THE SAME EVENT. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, A THIRD SUTURE FROM THE SAME BATCH WAS USED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18862667 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 8, 2017Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN PROCEDURE, THE TWO DEVICES' SUTURES BROKE. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED. PATIENT OUTCOME WAS ASKED BUT UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7008856 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page