V-Loc 180 VLOCL0624Recalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · Absorbable Wound Closure Device · Class 2 · Implant
All models of V-Loc 180 (61)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521131217), received between Nov 10, 2020 and Sep 4, 2026 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (6 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K091087); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break6
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 4, 2026Break
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50620355 ↗MalfunctionJul 28, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN OPEN PANNICULECTOMY PROCEDURE, SPECIFICALLY AT THE RUNNING DEEP DERMAL SUTURE STEP, THE FIRST SUTURE BROKE IN THE MIDDLE WHILE SUTURING, AND BARBS WERE OBSERVED FRAYING OFF. MOREOVER, ANOTHER TWO SUTURES BROKE IN THE MIDDLE WHILE SUTURING. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, THE COMPETITOR'S SUTURE WAS USED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22637282 ↗MalfunctionJul 28, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN OPEN PANNICULECTOMY PROCEDURE, SPECIFICALLY AT THE RUNNING DEEP DERMAL SUTURE STEP, THE FIRST SUTURE BROKE IN THE MIDDLE WHILE SUTURING, AND BARBS WERE OBSERVED FRAYING OFF. MOREOVER, ANOTHER TWO SUTURES BROKE IN THE MIDDLE WHILE SUTURING. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, THE COMPETITOR'S SUTURE WAS USED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22637149 ↗MalfunctionFeb 18, 2025Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING THE TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY, WHEN BEING APPLIED ON THE FEMORAL REGION, THE TWO SUTURES BROKE ON THE CENTER PART. ANOTHER NEW SUTURE WAS USED WITHOUT PROBLEM. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21396022 ↗MalfunctionFeb 18, 2025Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING THE TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY, WHEN BEING APPLIED ON THE FEMORAL REGION, THE TWO SUTURES BROKE ON THE CENTER PART. ANOTHER NEW SUTURE WAS USED WITHOUT PROBLEM. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21395435 ↗MalfunctionAug 10, 2022Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN ORTHOPEDIC SPINE PROCEDURE, WHILE APPLYING SUBCUTANEOUS SUTURING TECHNIQUE, THE NEEDLE BROKE. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15200701 ↗MalfunctionNov 10, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE BROKE AT NEEDLE AND HAD TO BE FISHED OUT OF PATIENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10815657 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K091087. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2919-2026 · Jun 24, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedV-Loc 180 Absorbable Wound Closure Device BOX BEDSIDE STAPLING IS KING BOX06614V4 BOX BY PASS FINAL BOX07405V1 BOX BYPASS CARDON BOX01056V2 BOX BYPASS DR LAGAE BOX0
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page