Skip to content

V-Loc 180 VLOCL0814Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Absorbable Wound Closure Device · Class 2 · Implant

All models of V-Loc 180 (61)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
16
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 16 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521131323), received between Aug 15, 2017 and Sep 21, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 14 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (9 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K091087); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break9
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component6
  • Unraveled Material2
  • Material Erosion1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
  • No Code Available3
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Patient Involvement1
  • Obstruction/Occlusion1
  • Wound Dehiscence1

Recent adverse event reports

The 16 most recent of 16 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 21, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50848038 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 18, 2026Break

    It was reported that preoperatively, the three sutures loop were broken. Another product was replaced to resolve the issue. There was no patient involved.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50311249 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 6, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, IN A TOTAL HYSTERECTOMY WITH BILATERAL ADNEXECTOMY, WHILE SUTURING WITH AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE, THE NEEDLE AND THREAD SEPARATED. THE ISSUE DELAYED THE PROGRESS OF THE SURGERY AND INCREASED THE OPERATION TIME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 25718941 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 10, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PREOPERATIVELY, THE SUTURE LOOP BROKE PRIOR TO HANDLING AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE. AN ADDITIONAL NEW SUTURE WAS USED WITHOUT ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23512320 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 24, 2024Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, WHEN THE SKIN INCISION WAS SUTURED, THE SUTURE SUDDENLY BROKE. THE DEVICE COULD NO LONGER BE USED. THE ISSUE ALSO LED TO THE OPENING OF THE WOUND. A NEW SUTURE WAS OPENED AND USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 19595905 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 17, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CERVICAL SPINE SURGERY, THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TAIL LOOP AND THE SUTURE BODY HAS COME OFF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18531812 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 1, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, ON A LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE AND THE THREAD OF ONE SUTURE WERE FOUND TO BE DISENGAGED DURING REMOVAL FROM THE PACKAGE. ANOTHER SUTURE¿S THREAD BROKE HALFWAY IN THE MULTIPLE SUTURING IN ANASTOMOSIS SCENE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12730487 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 31, 2021Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING PACEMAKER PLACEMENT, AT SUTURE CLOSURE OF SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE, THE NEEDLE AND THREAD CAME OFF. THE LOOP WAS ALSO MISSING FROM THE THREAD. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12398308 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 21, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A DERMIS SUTURING FOR A CAESAREAN SECTION, WHEN THE DOCTOR TRIED TO ATTACH A THREAD TO THE NEEDLE, THE THREAD WAS REMOVED FROM THE NEEDLE AND COULD NOT BE USED. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12037516 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRE OPERATIVELY, ON A TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL, THE SUTURE AND THE NEEDLE WERE FOUND DETACHED WHEN UN PACKING. THE SUTURE WAS REPLACED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10800117 ↗
  • InjurySep 19, 2018Break; Unraveled Material; Break; Unraveled Material

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR, THE LOOP UNRAVELED, THERE WAS A RISK OF INFECTION DUE TO REOPENING THE INCISION WHICH EXTENDED THE SURGICAL TIME. THEY USED ANOTHER DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE CASE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7891498 ↗
  • InjurySep 11, 2018Material Erosion; Material Erosion

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, 12 DAYS FOLLOWING AN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN EMERGENCY OPERATION DUE TO BLOCKAGE. THE PERITONEAL STITCHES FROM THE SUTURE USED ON THE ORIGINAL PROCEDURE HAD INTERNALIZED IN THE SMALL INTESTINE CREATING A VOLVULUS AND BLOCKAGE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Obstruction/Occlusion

    MAUDE report 7864715 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 9, 2018Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPY PROCEDURE, WHEN THE SURGEON WAS CLOSING THE PERITONEUM, THE THREAD BROKE, THE SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED BY 30 MINUTES OR MORE DUE TO THE PRODUCT PROBLEM. THEY USED ANOTHER DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7768542 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 24, 2017Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED DURING A CESAREAN SECTION, WHEN THE PACKAGE WAS OPENED IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE LOOP WAS BROKEN AND NOT DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THE STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6973870 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 15, 2017Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER: OCCURRED DURING A CESAREAN SECTION. DURING SUTURING, THE LOOP BROKE. THERE WAS NOT EXCESSIVE FORCE ON THE LOOP. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY OR EXTENSION IN SURGICAL TIME. PATIENT STATUS IS NO PROBLEM.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6868539 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 15, 2017Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING THE DERMAL SUTURING, WHEN THE FIRST STITCH WAS MADE AND THE NEEDLE GOT THROUGH THE LOOP, THE LOOP BROKE ALTHOUGH NO FORCE WAS ADDED ,AND THE THREAD CAME THROUGH OUT. NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6793832 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K091087. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2919-2026 · Jun 24, 2026 · Open, Classified
    V-Loc 180 Absorbable Wound Closure Device BOX BEDSIDE STAPLING IS KING BOX06614V4 BOX BY PASS FINAL BOX07405V1 BOX BYPASS CARDON BOX01056V2 BOX BYPASS DR LAGAE BOX0

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page