Skip to content

V-Loc 180 VLOCL2105Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Absorbable Wound Closure Device · Class 2 · Implant

All models of V-Loc 180 (61)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521131538), received between Mar 23, 2022 and Apr 21, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (5 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 24, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified

    Product may contain a perforation or tear in the sterile barrier packaging. This issue may result in biocontamination of the sterile sutures, which may lead to infection, loss of vision if in ophthalmic utilization, or prolonged surgery.

    Z-2919-2026 · Root cause: Equipment maintenance · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component5
  • Break4
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Unintended Radiation Exposure1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 21, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE, WHILE SUTURING OR PREPARING THE SUTURE AFTER PATIENT INCISION, ON THE FIRST SUTURE, THE NEEDLE BENT, AND IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CONNECTION OF NEEDLE AND THREAD BROKE AND THE NEEDLE DID NOT FALL INTO THE PATIENT CAVITY. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24941128 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 17, 2025Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE SUTURE BROKE WHILE SUTURING. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23829358 ↗
  • InjuryNov 3, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BILATERAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTEROSALPINGO-OOPHORECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE WHILE ON VAGINAL SUTURING, RESULTING IN A METAL FRAGMENT BEING RETAINED IN THE PATIENT. MULTIPLE INSTRUMENTAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, INCLUDING X-RAY, WERE CONDUCTED TO LOCATE THE NEEDLE FRAGMENT AND ASSESS FOR MIGRATION. THE FRAGMENT WAS DETERMINED TO BE NOT FREE OR MIGRATING AND WAS LEFT IN PLACE. THE EVENT LED TO AN EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION OF 4-5 DAYS FOR FURTHER CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATIONS, AS WELL AS READMITTANCE TO THE HOSPITAL. AN ADDITIONAL NEW SUTURE WAS USED WITHOUT ISSUE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Unintended Radiation Exposure

    MAUDE report 23459212 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 7, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRIC BYPASS PROCEDURE, AFTER 30 MINUTES OF BEING REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGING VIA RUNNING STITCH TECHNIQUE, THE SWAGED NEEDLE BROKE OFF FROM THE STRAND. THE NEEDLE FELL INTO THE CAVITY OF THE PATIENT, AND WAS ABLE TO RETRIEVE THE NEEDLE. IT OCCURRED ON TWO DIFFERENT SUTURES. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS OPENED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17701028 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 5, 2023Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN ENDOMETRIOSIS PROCEDURE, DURING VAGINAL CUPPING CLOSURE, THE THREAD BROKE. ANOTHER SUTURE FROM THE SAME BATCH WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16686293 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 25, 2022Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO USE THE WOUND CLOSURE DEVICES AND TWO OF WHICH SNAPPED WHEN TRIED TO BE USED TO ENTER THE BODY WALL.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15298080 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 24, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE NEEDLE AND THREAD BROKE. IT WAS CAME LOOSE FROM THE NEEDLE AND CAUSED THE SURGEON TO REMOVED THE NEEDLE FROM THE PACKAGE. IT WAS CONTAMINATED AND IT FELL ONTO THE FLOOR. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15286967 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 1, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING PROCEDURE, SUTURE SNAPPED OFF NEEDLE. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15142686 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE, WHILE PREPARING FOR SUTURING, THE CONNECTION BETWEEN NEEDLE AND THREAD BROKE. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, THE SURGEON SWITCHED TO THE COMPETITOR'S PRODUCT TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13866993 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page