Skip to content

V-Loc 180 VLOCL2145Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Absorbable Wound Closure Device · Class 2 · Implant

All models of V-Loc 180 (61)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521131545), received between Oct 9, 2017 and Jan 3, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (6 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 24, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified

    Product may contain a perforation or tear in the sterile barrier packaging. This issue may result in biocontamination of the sterile sutures, which may lead to infection, loss of vision if in ophthalmic utilization, or prolonged surgery.

    Z-2919-2026 · Root cause: Equipment maintenance · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component6
  • Break2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Material Frayed1
  • Unraveled Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Anxiety1
  • Distress1
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Pain1
  • Unspecified Tissue Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 3, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGING, THE THREAD WAS DISCONNECTED FROM THE NEEDLE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21068756 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 19, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRE-OPERATIVELY, THE NEEDLE DETACHED WHILE REMOVING FROM THE PACKAGING. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16963219 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 28, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRAOPERATIVELY, THE NEEDLE DISCONNECTED FROM THE STITCH WITH MINIMAL EFFORT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16453918 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 16, 2023Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING CLOSURE OF THE VAGINAL VAULT AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON WAS SUTURING LAPAROSCOPICALLY WITH THE SUTURE WHEN THE TAIL BROKE. THE SUTURE NEEDLE AND TAIL WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT CAVITY. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO SUTURE THE VAGINAL VAULT CLOSED IN THE SAME MANNER. ONCE AGAIN THE SUTURE TAIL BROKE WHILE THE SURGEON WAS USING IT TO APPROXIMATE SKIN. PATIENT HAD AN INCREASED TIME UNDER ANESTHESIA. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO CLOSE THE VAGINAL VAULT WITH A DIFFERENT SUTURE AND THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16386489 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 4, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, ON A ROBOTIC LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR, THE NEEDLE POPPED OFF THE STRAND PREMATURELY WHILE SEWING IN THE HERNIA MESH USING THE RUNNING STITCH TECHNIQUE. THE SURGEON HAD TO CUT THE STRAND AND USE A NEW SUTURE TO CONTINUE SEWING. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16099807 ↗
  • InjuryJul 29, 2022Material Frayed; Unraveled Material; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Frayed; Unraveled Material; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POST OPERATIVELY, 13 WEEKS AND 4 DAYS AFTER TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY, THE PATIENT WAS PRESENTED TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM WITH BLEEDING AND VAGINAL PAIN. VAGINAL CUFF REPAIR WAS PERFORMED TO FIX THE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: Anxiety; Distress; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain; Unspecified Tissue Injury; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 15132346 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 4, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN ABDOMINOPLASTY, BOTH NEEDLE AND THREAD BROKE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED. IT WAS STATED THAT THERE WERE TWO DEVICES INVOLVED ON THE SAME CASE. ADDITIONAL NEW SUTURE WAS USED WITHOUT ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11412711 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 9, 2017Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A ROBOTIC LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA PROCEDURE, THE THREAD OF THE SUTURE BROKE. IT OCCURRED WHEN PASSING NEEDLE THROUGH THE LOOP. THEY OPENED A NEW DEVICE TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6929117 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page