Skip to content

V-Loc 90 VLOCM0603Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Absorbable Wound Closure Device · Class 2 · Implant

All models of V-Loc 90 (56)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521132535), received between May 16, 2019 and Sep 1, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 24, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified

    Product may contain a perforation or tear in the sterile barrier packaging. This issue may result in biocontamination of the sterile sutures, which may lead to infection, loss of vision if in ophthalmic utilization, or prolonged surgery.

    Z-2918-2026 · Root cause: Equipment maintenance · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Device Slipped1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Patient Involvement2

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 1, 2026Break

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50548518 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 11, 2026Break; Material Twisted/Bent

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, IN A LAPAROSCOPIC THYROID PROCEDURE, WHILE SUTURING THE LINEA ALBA CERVICALIS, THE THREAD OF ONE SUTURE BROKE AND ITS NEEDLE GOT BENT. THE NEXT SUTURE USED HAD ITS NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE THREAD. SINCE TWO SUTURES HAD ISSUES IN A ROW, ANOTHER SUTURE FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER WAS USED BY THE SURGEON TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24569316 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 19, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRECTOMY PROCEDURE, WHILE CLOSING THE ENTRY HOLE, TO SUTURE THE TISSUES OF THE STOMACH AND DUODENUM, THE THREAD CAME OFF THE SUTURE PART. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18730995 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 26, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A DUAL CHAMBER PACEMAKER IMPLANT, AT THE TIME OF SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE CLOSURE, THE SUTURE WAS SEPARATED BELOW THE EYELET OF THE NEEDLE. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO REATTACH AND USE THE SUTURE FOR CLOSURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17398853 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 26, 2019Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRE OPERATIVELY, THE THREAD BROKE. AN ADDITIONAL NEW SUTURE WAS USED WITHOUT ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9125178 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 16, 2019Device Slipped; Device Slipped

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POST-OPERATIVELY, THE KNOT OF THE SUTURE WAS LOOSE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8618195 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page