Skip to content

ProGrip PP1509GRecalls & reported problems

Sofradim Production · Self-Gripping Polypropylene Mesh Polypropylene with Polylactic Acid Grips · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521177635), received between Jul 14, 2021 and Nov 15, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Mechanics Altered1

Patient problems

  • Inflammation2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Emotional Changes1
  • Fibrosis1
  • Hernia1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Muscle Weakness/Atrophy1
  • Nerve Damage1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 15, 2024Mechanics Altered; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Mechanics Altered; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT'S ATTORNEY ALLEGED A DEFICIENCY AGAINST THE DEVICE. THE PRODUCT WAS USED FOR THERAPEUTIC TREATMENT OF AN INGUINAL HERNIA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER IMPLANT, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED DEFECTIVE MESH, FAILURE OF MESH, INFECTION, RECURRENCE, INFLAMMATION, NERVE DAMAGE, SCARRING, PAIN, IMPAIRMENT, LOSS OF ENJOYMENT OF LIFE, MENTAL PAIN, DISABILITY. POST-OPERATIVE PATIENT TREATMENT INCLUDED REVISION SURGERY, REMOVAL OF MESH, HERNIA REPAIR WITH NEW MESH.

    Patient problems: Emotional Changes; Fibrosis; Hernia; Inflammation; Muscle Weakness/Atrophy; Nerve Damage; Pain; Scar Tissue; Unspecified Infection; Unspecified Tissue Injury

    MAUDE report 20696300 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 26, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL (TAPP) GROIN HERNIA PROCEDURE, THE PRODUCT WAS OPENED, THE MESH WAS DISCONNECTED IN THE MIDDLE; IT HAD NOT YET BEEN APPLIED TO THE PATIENT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18587805 ↗
  • InjuryJul 14, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, ONE DAY POST-OPERATIVELY ON A RIGHT INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD SEVERE CYSTITIS. THE PATIENT RECEIVED ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT HOWEVER IT DID NOT GO AWAY. THE PATIENT WENT TO THE UROLOGIST AND THE BLADDER WAS OKAY. WHEN THE SURGEON PERFORMED CT SCAN IT WAS FOUND OUT THAT WHERE THE NETWORK IS, THAT THE SURFACE OF THE BLADDER IS ALWAYS INFLAMED. ALLERGIC REACTION TO THE NET. BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE ALLERGY TEST THE PATIENT WAS NEGATIVE, THAT MEANS THE PATIENT HAD NO NEGATIVE REACTION RELATED TO THE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12164581 ↗

Other Mesh, surgical, polymeric devices

All Mesh, surgical, polymeric devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page