Skip to content

Symbotex SYM3020FRecalls & reported problems

Sofradim Production · Composite Mesh, Monofilament Polyester with Absorbable Collagen Film, Pre-placed Sutures and Marking · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Symbotex (31)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521190528), received between Sep 15, 2017 and Nov 11, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Loss of or Failure to Bond1
  • Mechanics Altered1
  • Product Quality Problem1

Patient problems

  • Hernia2
  • Tissue Breakdown2
  • Adhesion(s)1
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Burning Sensation1
  • Cramp(s) /Muscle Spasm(s)1
  • Distress1
  • Dizziness1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 11, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, IN A LAPAROSCOPIC PARASTOMAL HERNIA REPAIR SURGERY, DURING MESH-BASED ABDOMINAL WALL REINFORCEMENT WITH THE SUGARBAKER METHOD, THE MESH WAS TRIMMED AND PLACED WITH THE FRONT AND BACK REVERSED. THE MISTAKE WAS NOTICED AFTER THE SURGERY, SO ANOTHER OPERATION WAS PERFORMED THE NEXT DAY, AND AN ADDITIONAL MESH FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER WAS PLACED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Breakdown

    MAUDE report 23519855 ↗
  • InjuryAug 1, 2025Mechanics Altered; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Mechanics Altered; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE PATIENT'S ATTORNEY ALLEGED A DEFICIENCY AGAINST THE DEVICE. THE PRODUCT WAS USED FOR THERAPEUTIC TREATMENT OF AN INGUINAL HERNIA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER IMPLANT, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED NAUSEA, VOMITING, HEADACHES, FORGETFULNESS, BURNING SENSATION, ITCHING SENSATION, DIZZINESS, CRAMPING, LEFT TESTICLE PAIN, STRESS, FATIGUE, DEFECTIVE MESH, FAILURE OF MESH, MASS, RECURRENCE, ALLERGIC REACTION, ADHESIONS, SCARRING, PAIN, MENTAL PAIN, IMPAIRMENT, LOSS OF ENJOYMENT OF LIFE. POST-OPERATIVE PATIENT TREATMENT INCLUDED MEDICATION, PARTIAL MESH REMOVAL, REMOVAL OF MESH, EXCISION OF MASS.

    Patient problems: Adhesion(s); Burning Sensation; Cramp(s) /Muscle Spasm(s); Distress; Dizziness; Emotional Changes; Fatigue; Headache; Hernia; Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; Itching Sensation; Memory Loss/Impairment; Nausea; Nodule; Pain; Scar Tissue; Unspecified Tissue Injury; Vomiting

    MAUDE report 22689442 ↗
  • InjuryJul 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, IN A LAPAROSCOPIC STOMA HERNIA REPAIR SURGERY, DURING REINFORCEMENT OF THE ILEOSTOMY SITE, THE FRONT AND BACK SIDES OF THE MESH WERE INCORRECTLY PLACED. AN ADDITIONAL MESH WAS APPLIED LAPAROSCOPICALLY THE DAY AFTER THE SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Tissue Breakdown

    MAUDE report 22621083 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 23, 2022Product Quality Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Product Quality Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING LAPAROSCOPIC HERNIA REPAIR, TWO FIXATION THREADS WERE NOT CONNECTED TO THE MESH AND TWO WERE WRONG KNOTTED. THE PROBLEM WAS THEN SOLVED BY TACKING THE NET. THE EVENT LED TO RECURRENCE OF HERNIA.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Hernia

    MAUDE report 13585140 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 9, 2020Loss of or Failure to Bond; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING PLACEMENT OF MESH TO THE ABDOMINAL WALL FOR A LAPAROSCOPIC INCISIONAL HERNIA REPAIR, THE DEVICE MISFIRED. AFTER PLACING THE FIRST FOUR TACKERS, THE MESH FELL DOWN FROM THE ABDOMINAL CAVITY. THE TACKERS PASSED THROUGH THE GAPS OF THE MESH. THE SAID MESH WAS RE-FIXED AND STILL IMPLANTED TO PATIENT WITH THE HELP OF ANOTHER DEVICE FROM A DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10252030 ↗
  • InjurySep 15, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER: THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR. POST-OPERATIVELY, THE VISCERAL SIDE OF THE MESH WAS SO INTERTWINED AND THE PARIETAL SIDE PRACTICALLY WITHOUT ADHESIONS AND DID NOT HOLD. THIS EVENT LED THE PATIENT TO UNDERGO SECOND SURGERY FOR INCARCERATED RECURRENCE APPROXIMATELY 6 WEEKS POST OP. PATIENT IS ALIVE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 6868735 ↗

Other Mesh, Surgical, Polymeric devices

All Mesh, Surgical, Polymeric devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page