Skip to content

Kangaroo 8884720825Recalls & reported problems

Cardinal Health, Inc. · Nasogastric Feeding Tube,3 g Weighted Tip, Rigid Port, Stylet · Class 2

All models of Kangaroo (145)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521518827), received between Jul 17, 2018 and Jun 5, 2023 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove3
  • Complete Blockage1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Retraction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Discomfort1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 5, 2023Difficult to Remove; Material Twisted/Bent; Difficult to Remove; Material Twisted/Bent

    CUSTOMER REPORTS: UPON ATTEMPTED REMOVAL OF THE GUIDEWIRE, THE TUBING BEGAN TO KINK AND THE GUIDEWIRE WAS UNABLE TO BE REMOVED. ANOTHER NASOGASTRIC TUBE HAD TO BE INSERTED. THE PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED BUT HAD TO HAVE THIS UNCOMFORTABLE PROCEDURE DONE TWICE AS A RESULT. THIS HAPPENED WITH THE SAME PATIENT, BUT IT WAS 2 DIFFERENT DAYS. THE PATIENT WAS CONFUSED A COUPLE DAYS LATER AND REMOVED HIS TUBE, SO ANOTHER NEEDED TO BE INSERTED. THE DOCTOR HAD DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE STYLET AND AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS AND SALINE FLUSHING HE WAS FINALLY ABLE TO REMOVE IT. I DO NOT KNOW IF THE LOT WAS THE SAME FOR BOTH OF THESE TUBES.

    Patient problems: Discomfort

    MAUDE report 17065162 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 27, 2021Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE METAL GUIDE PIERCED THE GREEN TIP, EXPOSING A METAL SPIKE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED. FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED STATED THAT REMOVAL OF THE GUIDEWIRE BECOMES EXTREMELY DANGEROUS FOR THE PATIENT, SO THEY HAD TO REMOVE THE ENTIRE TUBE AND INSERT A NEW WITH THE SAME ITEM CODE. THE INSERTION TOOK PLACE IN THE OPERATING ROOM, AND THE REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE WAS IN AMBULATORY SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11734733 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 28, 2019Complete Blockage; Complete Blockage

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT WHEN SHE PUT THE TUBE IN, THERE WAS A BLOCKAGE. ON (B)(6) 2019 THE CUSTOMER CLARIFIED THAT WHEN THE PATIENT'S MOTHER PLACED THE TUBE THROUGH THE NOSE, THERE WAS A BLOCKAGE AND NOTHING COULD PASS. ADDITIONALLY, THE CUSTOMER MENTIONED THAT THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES AS A RESULT OF THIS COMPLAINT, ONLY THAT NOTHING WENT THROUGH THE TUBE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8942094 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 17, 2018Difficult to Remove; Retraction Problem

    THE CUSTOMER STATES THAT THEY ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE GUIDE WIRE BUT THE NURSE WAS UNABLE TO PULL BACK ON THE GUIDE WIRE. EVENTUALLY, THE NURSE HAD TO REMOVE THE TUBE COMPLETELY BECAUSE THE WIRE WOULD NOT RELEASE. ONCE THE NURSE REMOVED THE TUBE FROM THE PATIENT, THE GUIDE WIRE COULD NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE TUBE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7694085 ↗

Other TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices

All TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page