Skip to content

Versatex VTX4530MRecalls & reported problems

Sofradim Production · Monofilament Mesh, Macroporous Polyester · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521532274), received between Feb 26, 2020 and Oct 15, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3

Patient problems

  • Hernia3
  • Muscle Weakness/Atrophy1
  • No Code Available1
  • Pain1
  • Unspecified Tissue Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROBOTIC LAPAROSCOPIC INCISIONAL HERNIA REPAIR USING MESH IMPLANTED IN THE VENTRAL REGION, A HERNIA RECURRENCE OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY 12 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE RECURRENCE LED TO THE NEED FOR AN ADDITIONAL COMPLEX HERNIA REPAIR SURGERY. AN ADDITIONAL SURGERY AND HOSPITAL STAY WERE REQUIRED DUE TO THE EVENT. UPON RE-OPERATION, THERE WAS A SUSPECTED MESH FRACTURE, AS THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF CONNECTED MESH OVER THE CENTER OF THE DEFECT.

    Patient problems: Hernia

    MAUDE report 23288058 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 28, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT¿S ATTORNEY ALLEGED A DEFICIENCY AGAINST THE DEVICE. THE PRODUCT WAS USED FOR THERAPEUTIC TREATMENT OF AN INCISIONAL HERNIA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER IMPLANT, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN, RECURRENCE, DIASTASIS OF THE UPPER RECTUS MUSCLE.

    Patient problems: Hernia; Muscle Weakness/Atrophy; Pain; Unspecified Tissue Injury

    MAUDE report 18803634 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, 10 MONTHS AGO, ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY WAS PERFORMED AND THE MESH WAS PLACED TO REPAIR THE VENTRAL HERNIA. POSTOPERATIVELY, AT THE EPIGASTRIC, UMBILICAL, AND INFRAUMBILICAL PART ON A LAPAROSCOPIC ROBOT ASSISTED VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR, THE MESH HAD A 13CM BY 27CM DEFECT. THE PATIENT HAD A RECURRENT HERNIA THROUGH THE MESH 10 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAD TO BE HOSPITALIZED AGAIN FOR A SECOND OPERATION VIA LAPAROSCOPIC INTRAPERITONEAL ONLAY MESH TO REPAIR THE RECURRENT HERNIA.

    Patient problems: Hernia; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9756293 ↗

Other Mesh, Surgical, Polymeric devices

All Mesh, Surgical, Polymeric devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page