Skip to content

Dextile DXT1612ARRecalls & reported problems

Sofradim Production · Anatomical Mesh Pre-shaped Monofilament Polypropylene Textile with Marking;Right Side · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521726536), received between Dec 11, 2020 and Apr 16, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of or Failure to Bond” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Loss of or Failure to Bond1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • Hernia2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Discomfort1
  • Distress1
  • Pain1
  • Seroma1
  • Swelling/ Edema1
  • Unspecified Tissue Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 16, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    The patient's attorney alleged a deficiency against the device. The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an inguinal hernia. It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrence, pain, suffering, seroma, swollen testicle, discomfort, emotional distress and death. Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery and mesh revision. Information received indicates the patient is deceased. No information was provided regarding the circumstances of expiration.

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Distress; Hernia; Pain; Seroma; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Tissue Injury

    MAUDE report 24905006 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 26, 2022Loss of or Failure to Bond; Loss of or Failure to Bond

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC BILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR PROCEDURE, WHILE IMPLANTING THE MESH, THE MESH DID NOT ALIGN PROPERLY WITH THE ANATOMY OF THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE ANATOMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE MESH. THIS CAUSED THE INFERIOR PORTION OF THE MESH TO NOT LAY PROPERLY. THE SURGEON ALSO STATED THAT THE MESH DID NOT GIVE ENOUGH MEDICAL COVERAGE FOR THE SURGEON TO FEEL COMFORTABLE LEAVING THE MESH IN PLACE. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO USE A DIFFERENT MESH TO COMPLETE THE CASE AND RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14215606 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POST-OPERATIVELY OF A ROBOTIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR, THE PATIENT WAS HAVING PAIN AND WAS HAVING TROUBLE WALKING DUE TO THE PAIN. THE PATIENT WAS EXAMINED BY THE SURGEON UNDER ROBOTIC LAPAROSCOPY AND IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT AN INGUINAL HERNIA REOCCURRENCE WAS PRESENT IN THE PATIENT'S RIGHT INGUINAL SPACE THE MESH WAS VISIBLY CURLED ON THE LATERAL EDGE. THE HERNIA WAS REDUCED AND THE MESH DISSECTED BUT WAS UNABLE TO BE EXPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Hernia

    MAUDE report 12849955 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 11, 2020Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A ROBOTIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO INSERT THE MESH ON THE TROCAR FOR IT WAS DAMAGED. ANOTHER MESH WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE AND COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10991599 ↗

Other Mesh, surgical, polymeric devices

All Mesh, surgical, polymeric devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.