Skip to content

Surgipro II VP701X-2Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Monofilament Polypropylene · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Surgipro II (73)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521758193), received between Sep 8, 2021 and Aug 8, 2024 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 8, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A SHUNT PROCEDURE, THE WHEN THE DEVICE WAS USED AS USUAL WITH NORMAL FORCE, THE THREAD BROKE. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19941113 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2022Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING SURGERY, TWO SUTURES FROM DIFFERENT MODELS WERE BREAKING.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15739500 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 12, 2022Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAPH PROCEDURE, AT THE BEGINNING OF THE ANASTOMOSIS, THE THREAD BROKE. ANOTHER STRAND WAS USED TO CONTINUE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14087958 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 8, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER PREOPERATIVELY, THE NEEDLE POPPED OFF WHILE BEING PULLED OUT OF THE PACKAGE. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE IS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12440100 ↗

Other Suture, nonabsorbable, synthetic, polypropylene devices

All Suture, nonabsorbable, synthetic, polypropylene devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page