Skip to content

Surgipro II VP713X-2Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Monofilament Polypropylene · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Surgipro II (73)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521758216), received between Mar 14, 2022 and Sep 18, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 2 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Use of Device Problem2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Product Quality Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 18, 2026Break

    According to the reporter, intraoperatively, upon opening the package, it was found that the suture was already broken. It was not used on the patient. Another product of the same model was used to resolve the issue. There was no patient injury.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50819025 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 5, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING THE CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT, TWO SUTURE THREADS WERE STUCK WHEN PULLING THROUGH TISSUE WHICH PUT A RISK OF TEARING HEART TISSUE. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21964723 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 5, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING THE CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT, TWO SUTURE THREADS WERE STUCK WHEN PULLING THROUGH TISSUE WHICH PUT A RISK OF TEARING HEART TISSUE. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21964655 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 5, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, WHILE SUTURING, THE SUTURE BROKE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19905582 ↗
  • InjuryMay 6, 2022Product Quality Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Product Quality Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE FEELS LARGER THAN NORMAL. IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS MORE BLEEDING. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, THE SURGEON FINISHED USING THE SUTURE.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 14308971 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 14, 2022Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A MITRAL VALVE REPAIR WITH CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING, WHILE SUTURING THE ANASTOMOSIS OF AORTA, THE FIRST THREAD BROKE AFTER SEVENTH THROWS WHILE THE SECOND THREAD BROKE AFTER THREE THROWS. THE SURGEON OPENED A NEW SUTURE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13759795 ↗

Other Suture, nonabsorbable, synthetic, polypropylene devices

All Suture, nonabsorbable, synthetic, polypropylene devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page