Skip to content

VLOC 90 VLOCM0436Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Absorbable Wound Closure Device · Class 2 · Implant

All models of VLOC 90 (4)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521827516), received between Sep 7, 2023 and Jun 25, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 24, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified

    Product may contain a perforation or tear in the sterile barrier packaging. This issue may result in biocontamination of the sterile sutures, which may lead to infection, loss of vision if in ophthalmic utilization, or prolonged surgery.

    Z-2918-2026 · Root cause: Equipment maintenance · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Component Missing1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 25, 2026Break; Component Missing

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CESAREAN SECTION WHILE SUTURING THE UTERUS, THE SUTURE DID NOT HOLD IN TISSUE DUE TO THE BARBS NOT FIXATING PROPERLY AND THEN THE THREAD BROKE IN THE MIDDLE. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25617775 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 19, 2026Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY, WHILE SUTURING, THE SUTURE SNAPPED. THE ISSUE HAPPENED TO MULTIPLE SUTURES. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24646183 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CAESAREAN SECTION PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE THREAD OF THE DEVICE DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE WHILE SUTURING THE UTERUS. NO COMPONENT FELL INTO THE CAVITY. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, A NEW DEVICE WAS USED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23486790 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 7, 2023Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN CESAREAN SECTION PROCEDURE, WHEN THE SURGEON BEGAN TO CLOSE THE UTERUS USING THE ABSORBABLE SUTURE VIA THE RUNNING LOCKING STICH TECHNIQUE, A FEW SECONDS AFTER PASSING THROUGH THE LOOP, THE THREAD SNAPPED ON THE THIRD STITCH. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17704345 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page