Maxon 8886 6618-51Recalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · Monofilament Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Maxon (114)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884523001822), received between Mar 17, 2017 and May 8, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries, 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (6 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K990951); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component6
- Break4
- Detachment Of Device Component1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- Foreign Body In Patient3
- Unintended Radiation Exposure3
- Insufficient Information1
- Radiation Exposure, Unintended1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 8, 2024Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR OPEN PROCEDURE, CLOSING THE INCISION, THE THREE NEEDLES BROKE AND ONE NEEDLE FELL INTO THE CAVITY OF THE PATIENT. AN X-RAY WAS PERFORMED, AND THE SURGICAL TIME WAS ALSO EXTENDED TO 30 MINUTES. IT WAS NOTED THAT NEEDLE WAS RETRIEVED. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Unintended Radiation Exposure
MAUDE report 19268274 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2024Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR OPEN PROCEDURE, CLOSING THE INCISION, THE THREE NEEDLES BROKE AND ONE NEEDLE FELL INTO THE CAVITY OF THE PATIENT. AN X-RAY WAS PERFORMED, AND THE SURGICAL TIME WAS ALSO EXTENDED TO 30 MINUTES. IT WAS NOTED THAT NEEDLE WAS RETRIEVED. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Unintended Radiation Exposure
MAUDE report 19268251 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2024Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR OPEN PROCEDURE, CLOSING THE INCISION, THE THREE NEEDLES BROKE AND ONE NEEDLE FELL INTO THE CAVITY OF THE PATIENT. AN X-RAY WAS PERFORMED, AND THE SURGICAL TIME WAS ALSO EXTENDED TO 30 MINUTES. IT WAS NOTED THAT NEEDLE WAS RETRIEVED. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Unintended Radiation Exposure
MAUDE report 19268173 ↗MalfunctionApr 25, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A BREAST AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE, THE SWAGED PART OF THE NEEDLE/THREAD KEPT SEPARATING/BREAKING. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED BUT IT WOULD ALSO BREAK. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16808400 ↗MalfunctionMar 10, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE TEN SUTURES WERE BREAKING AT THE SWAGED PART.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 16525825 ↗MalfunctionFeb 8, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A BREAST AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE, THE SWAGED PART OF THE NEEDLE/THREAD KEPT SEPARATING/BREAKING. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED BUT IT WOULD ALSO BREAK. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16330376 ↗MalfunctionFeb 1, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN ABDOMINOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE SWAGED PART OF THE NEEDLE/THREAD KEPT SEPARATING/BREAKING. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED, BUT IT WOULD ALSO BREAK. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16277864 ↗MalfunctionFeb 3, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE NEEDLE BREAK OFF FROM THE THREAD. THE SURGEON THEN USED ANOTHER DEVICE TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11272308 ↗MalfunctionNov 24, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PLASTIC SURGERY ON THE BREAST TISSUE, WHEN CLOSING, THE FOUR NEEDLES KEPT POPPING OFF THE STRAND WITH VERY LITTLE FORCE. IT OCCURRED WHILE THE SURGEON WAS USING AN INSTRUMENT BUT ALSO WHILE USING THE HANDS. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10896250 ↗InjuryMar 17, 2017Break; Detachment Of Device Component; Break; Detachment Of Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER; DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE OF THE SUTURE BROKE OFF AND AN X-RAY WAS UTILIZED TO SEARCH FOR THE FRAGMENT WHICH HAD FALLEN INTO THE FEMORAL ARTERY IN PROXIMITY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM AND RESULTING IN AN EXTENSION OF THE PROCEDURE BY AN HOUR. THE FRAGMENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND NO DAMAGE WAS CAUSED BY THE FRAGMENT.
Patient problems: Radiation Exposure, Unintended
MAUDE report 6415506 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K990951. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2542-2017 · May 3, 2017 · TerminatedSutures. MAXON: MAXON 4/0 5X18" GREEN CV-24 D-TACH; Item Number: 8886621933; MAXON 5/0 5X18 GR CV-23 D-TACH; Item Number: XX2109; MAXON* 4/0 5X30 GREEN V-20 D*TACH; Item Number:
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page