V. Mueller GL1600-003Recalls & reported problems
Steris Corporation · V. Mueller SIMS UTERINE CURETTE SIZE 3 SHARP, MALLEABLE OVERALL LENGTH 11-1/8 inches 28.4CM · Class 1
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10885403044632), received between Feb 1, 2023 and Feb 1, 2023 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 1, 2023Break; Break
MATERIAL NO: GL1600-003. BATCH NO: G19. IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT PART OF A UTERINE CURRETTE BROKE OFF INSIDE PATIENT. VERBATIM: PART OF A UTERINE CURETTE BROKE OFF INSIDE A PATIENT. 11JAN2023 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: DO YOU HAVE THE LOT NUMBER? YES, THE LOT NUMBER IS G19. I WAS IN THE HOSPITAL TODAY TO VERIFY THIS ALONG WITH THE PRODUCT CODE. WHAT WAS THE PROCEDURE THAT WAS BEING PERFORMED? HYSTEROSCOPY + D & C. HOW WAS THE INSTRUMENT RETRIEVED AND WERE ALL PARTS RECOVERED? THE PATIENT HAD BEEN BROUGHT OUT OF SURGERY AND OFF OF ANESTHESIA. AN X-RAY WAS THEN PERFORMED WHERE THEY DISCOVERED THE BROKEN PIECE WAS INSIDE PATIENT. THEY THEN BROUGHT THE PATIENT BACK INTO SURGERY, UNDER ANESTHESIA, AND REMOVED THE PART OF THE CURETTE THAT BROKE OFF. ALL PARTS WERE RECOVERED. WAS THERE A MEDICAL PROCEDURE PERFORMED TO VERIFY IF THE INSTRUMENT WAS IN THE PATIENT¿S BODY, SUCH AS AN X-RAY? YES, AN X-RAY WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY THAT THE INSTRUMENT PIECE WAS INSIDE THE PATIENT. WHAT WAS THE PATIENT¿S OUTCOME? PATIENT WAS FINE/HAD NO ISSUES AND WAS DISCHARGED THE SAME DAY. WAS THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED AS PLANNED? YES, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AS PLANNED. DO YOU HAVE PHOTOS OF THE REP
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 16279916 ↗
Other CURETTE, UTERINE devices
- Sklar Instruments 96-4113Sklar Corporation · CURETTE, UTERINE1 recall0 reports
- AESCULAP ER402RAesculap AG · CURETTE, UTERINE2 reports
- AESCULAP ER223RAesculap AG · CURETTE, UTERINE2 reports
- CARDINAL HEALTH SMA11LSJH3Cardinal Health 200, LLC · CURETTE, UTERINE1 report
- V. Mueller GL1625Steris Corporation · CURETTE, UTERINE1 report
- Busse Hospital Disposables 284Robert Busse & CO., Inc. · Curette, Uterine1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page