Skip to content

Snowden-Pencer 88-1086Recalls & reported problems

Steris Corporation · Snowden-Pencer Plastics RETRACTOR TEBBETTS FIBER OPTICS 9CM X 30MM BLADE · Class 1

All models of Snowden-Pencer (62)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885403151651), received between Jul 22, 2022 and Apr 3, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Smoking1

Patient problems

  • Burn(s)1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 3, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED WHILE UTILIZING A FIBEROPTIC RETRACTOR HANDLE DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE, A NURSE OBSERVED A "BURN" ON THE PATIENT'S SKIN. OINTMENT WAS APPLIED TO THE AREA AND THE PATIENT PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Burn(s)

    MAUDE report 19034059 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 22, 2022Smoking; Smoking

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT EXPERIENCED AN ELECTRICAL ISSUE. VERBATIM: INADEQUATE LIGHT COMING FROM TEBBETTS RETRACTORS. CUSTOMER HAS (4) EACH OF FOLLOWING: 88-1086, 88-1087, 88-1088 AND 88-1090. JUST FOR SOME HISTORY. ONE OF THE SURGEONS A WEEK OR 2 AGO HAD ISSUE WITH LACK OF ILLUMINATION WHEN USING THE RETRACTOR SET. I (BIOMED) RESPONDED AND FOUND THAT THEY WERE USING A KARL STORZ LIGHT SOURCE WITH A 4-WAY TURRET ON IT. GENERALLY, THIS TURRET ALLOWS FOR CONNECTION OF 4 DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER¿S LIGHT CABLES HOWEVER, THE SNOWDEN PENCER CABLE DOES NOT POSITIVELY MATCH UP TO ANY OF THEM. THE LIGHT SOURCE ITSELF WAS RUNNING AT 100% INTENSITY AND 43 HRS OF A 500 HR BULB LIFE. THE NURSE WAS ATTEMPTING TO HOLD YOUR3MM CABLE INTO ONE OF THE HOLES ON THE TURRET. JUST MOVING THE CABLE AROUND IN THAT TURRET HAS SOME EFFECT ON THE AMOUNT OF LIGHT GETTING TO THE RETRACTOR. I HAD SUGGESTED THEY TRY TO USE OUR ¿NEW¿ STRYKER LED LIGHT SOURCE AS AT LEAST IT ACCEPTS YOUR CABLE BETTER AND HOLDS IT IN PLACE POSITIVELY. AFTER THE CASE I HAD THE LIGHT SOURCE AND THE RETRACTOR SET BROUGHT TO ME. I TESTED IT A BIT WITH THE KARL STORZ XENON LIGHT SOURCE AND DID NOT GET WHAT I WOULD CONSIDER TO BE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15086684 ↗

Other RETRACTOR, FIBEROPTIC devices

All RETRACTOR, FIBEROPTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page