Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-012-35-5015Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862001955), received between May 26, 2022 and Oct 10, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (5 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K033883); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant4
  • Synovitis4
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available3
  • Joint effusion2
  • Osteolysis2
  • Pain2
  • Discomfort1
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 10, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 96 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, JOINT LAXITY, AND PAIN. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain

    MAUDE report 20418587 ↗
  • InjuryMay 22, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 94 MONTHS AFTER A RIGHT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PAIN DUE TO POLYETHYLENE WEAR, SYNOVITIS, AND OSTEOLYSIS. REVISION SURGERY OPERATIVE NOTES WERE PROVIDED. POST OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS NOTED EXTENSIVE POLYETHYLENE SYNOVITIS, MILD PERIPROSTATIC OSTEOLYSIS, WELL-FIXED FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENT, A WELL-FIXED PATELLAR COMPONENT WITH NO SIGNIFICANT WEAR, AND EXTENSIVE PITTING AND DELAMINATION OF THE POSTERIOR ASPECT OF THE POST AND TOP SIDE OF THE INSERT MEDIALLY. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. PATIENT LEFT THE RECOVERY ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Osteolysis; Pain; Scar Tissue; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 19370333 ↗
  • InjuryJul 20, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THE MALE PATIENT HAD A BILATERAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2014. APPROXIMATELY 8 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A BILATERAL REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. REVISION OP REPORT ON (B)(6) 2022. DIAGNOSIS: FAILED BILATERAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY SECONDARY TO ASEPTIC FEMORAL LOOSENING AND POLYETHYLENE WEAR. FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS LOOSE WITH CYST FOUND POSTERIOR LATERAL. PATIENT WAS AWAKENED AND TAKEN TO RECOVERY ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Failure of Implant; Joint effusion; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 17362695 ↗
  • InjuryJul 19, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION, A PATIENT HAD BILATERAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2014. THEY SUBSEQUENTLY UNDERWENT RIGHT KNEE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 8 YEARS 5 MONTHS POST PRIMARY PROCEDURE. (B)(6) 2022 OP REPORT POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: FAILED BILATERAL TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY SECONDARY TO ASEPTIC FEMORAL LOOSENING AND POLYETHYLENE WEAR. THE RIGHT PATELLA WAS FOUND TO BE WELL FIXED. THE FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS EASILY DISIMPACTED FROM THE INTACT CEMENT MANTLE. TIBIA WAS CHECKED AND WAS FOUND TO BE WELL FIXED. THERE WAS A LARGE CYST POSTERIOR LATERAL, WHICH WAS NOT DECOMPRESSED FROM THE ARTHROTOMY. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Failure of Implant; Joint effusion; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 17355901 ↗
  • InjuryOct 27, 2022Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED BY LEGAL TEAM, APPROXIMATELY TWELVE YEARS POST INITIAL RIGHT SIDE TKA, THE MALE PATIENT HAD A REVISION FOR AN UNKNOWN REASON. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Discomfort; Failure of Implant; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 15685523 ↗
  • InjuryMay 26, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED BY THE EXACTECH KNEE REPLACEMENT STUDY, APPROXIMATELY TEN YEARS POST INITIAL TKA, THE (B)(6) MALE PATIENT HAS VERY MINIMAL BONE LYSIS UNDER THE MEDIAL TIBIAL BASE PLATE. EVENT IS ONGOING. PER CLINICAL STUDY CASE REPORT FORM INDICATES THIS EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO DEVICES AND/OR PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 14518748 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K033883. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0584-2024 · Nov 21, 2023 · Open, Classified
    Exactech Optetrak Logic PS Knee System, Catalog Numbers: 02-012-35-5009
  • Z-0906-2015 · Oct 9, 2014 · Terminated
    Optetrak Asymmetric Hi-Flex Posterior Stabilized Cemented Femorals, size 3, Catalog #244-02-03, Catalog #244-03-03. Usage:Femoral implants

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page