Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-012-45-2515Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862003928), received between Jun 6, 2025 and Dec 30, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2

Patient problems

  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Implant Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 30, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 7 YEARS POST OP INITIAL LEFT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, THIS WAS REVISED DUE TO POLY WEAR AND FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS ASEPTIC LOOSENING. ALL COMPONENTS WERE REPLACED WITH A REVISION KNEE SYSTEM. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO FURTHER PATIENT IMPACT WAS REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 23921667 ↗
  • InjuryJun 6, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY NINE YEARS POST THE INITIAL RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, THE PATIENT WAS BROUGHT BACK FOR RIGHT KNEE PAIN. THE POLY INSERT WAS REMOVED WITH THE HELP OF AN OSTEOTOME. THE TIBIA WAS CHECKED AND FOUND TO BE LOOSE AND REMOVED. THE FEMUR WAS CHECKED AND FOUND TO BE LOOSE AND REMOVED. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A KNEE SIZE 2 TRULIANT LOGIC CC FEMUR, PRESS FIT STEMS, SIZE 1 TIBIA AND A 17 CC INSERT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 22160867 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page