Optetrak Logic 02-012-45-3040Recalls & reported problems
Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Optetrak Logic (408)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862003973), received between Sep 16, 2019 and Aug 18, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Discomfort2
- Joint Laxity2
- Joint effusion2
- Osteolysis2
- Pain2
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Balance Problems1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 18, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ON THE RIGHT SIDE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED STIFFNESS, PAIN, OSTEOLYSIS, FEMORAL AND TIBIAL IMPLANT LOOSENING, AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT. AS A RESULT, APPROXIMATELY TEN YEARS AND ONE-MONTH POST-SURGERY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO COMPETITOR'S DEVICES. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO FURTHER IMPACT TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED. THE PRODUCTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 3 FOR THIS EVENT/PATIENT.
Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain
MAUDE report 22829311 ↗InjuryMar 3, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 70 MONTHS AFTER A RIGHT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS LOOSENING, AMBULATION DIFFICULTIES, BALANCE PROBLEMS, DISCOMFORT, OSTEOLYSIS, PAIN AND SYNOVITIS. REVISION SURGERY OPERATIVE NOTES WERE PROVIDED. PATIENT LEFT THE OPERATING ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Balance Problems; Discomfort; Osteolysis; Pain; Synovitis
MAUDE report 21506604 ↗InjuryDec 8, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL LEFT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, THE PATIENT HAS DISCOMFORT AND PERIODS OF INFLAMMATION. X-RAY SHOWED SIGNS OF LOOSENING OF THE TIBIAL COMPONENT AND DELAMINATION OF THE INSERT IN BOTH COMPARTMENTS. SLIGHT JOINT EFFUSION, SLIGHT LAXITY. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED. THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS DETERIORATED WHEN REMOVED.
Patient problems: Discomfort; Inflammation; Joint Laxity; Joint effusion
MAUDE report 20875377 ↗InjuryJul 22, 2024Unstable; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Unstable; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MALE PATIENT, INITIAL LEFT KNEE IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2019, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024, APPROXIMATELY 4 YEARS 8 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS SUFFERING FROM LAXITY, INSTABILITY, AND CHRONIC HYDRARTHROSIS. MACROSCOPIC PE GRANULOMA INDICATED. THE REPORT STATED THE PATIENT HAD ASEPTIC TIBIAL AND FEMORAL LOOSENING 5 YEARS AFTER THE INITIAL PLACEMENT. THE PE WAS CHANGED. NO SURGICAL DELAYS OR DEVICE BREAKAGES WERE REPORTED. NO X-RAYS WERE PROVIDED. THE DEVICE RETURN STATUS FOR ANALYSIS IS UNKNOWN CURRENTLY. THEY HAVE BEEN REQUESTED. NO DEVICE IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
Patient problems: Granuloma; Joint Laxity; Joint effusion
MAUDE report 19801708 ↗InjurySep 16, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
INDEX SURGERY: (B)(6) 2014. PENDING REVISION OF THE LEFT KNEE - REASON NOT REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 9069828 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page