Acumatch A Series 132-28-06Recalls & reported problems
Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Acumatch A Series (94)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862023018), received between Jun 19, 2020 and Feb 3, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (5 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K993082); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Aug 11, 2022Class IIOpen, Classified
Specific GXL acetabular polyethylene liners, packaged in non-conforming bags, may adversely impact the device and contribute to accelerated wear.
Z-1734-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Naturally Worn5
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation2
- Pain2
- Failure of Implant1
- Joint Laxity1
- Osteolysis1
- Swelling/ Edema1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 3, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT, WHO HAD A THA, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE APPROXIMATELY 19 YEARS 5 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO EXPECTED WEAR AND REPORTS OF DISLOCATION. THE HEAD LINER WAS EXCHANGED. IT WAS STATED THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH THE SURGERY. THE EXPLANTED DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. AN X-RAY WAS PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 24251567 ↗InjurySep 18, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 20 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN AND WEAR. THE PATIENT WAS CONVERTED TO A COMPETITOR CUP AND DUAL MOBILITY LINER. A NEW EXACTECH HEAD WAS PLACED. THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH THE SURGERY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 23083103 ↗InjurySep 11, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
LEGAL CASE ¿ USA (MASTER CASE NO. (B)(4)). RELATED (B)(4) LH REV 1. (B)(4) LH REV 2. IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 166 MONTHS AFTER A TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAS EXPERIENCED PROSTHESIS WEAR, PAIN, SWELLING, INSTABILITY, OSTEOLYSIS. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE." (B)(6) 132-28-06 - ACUMATCH 15 DEGREE LINER 28MM SZ F. ***SERIAL NUMBER (B)(6) IS CONFIRMED TO HAVE BEEN PACKAGED IN A VACUUM BAG THAT DOES CONTAIN EVOH AND WAS NOT AFFECTED BY THE RECALL.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Osteolysis; Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 20193831 ↗InjuryAug 5, 2021Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
AS REPORTED, SURGEON REVISED PATIENT DUE TO DISLOCATING. SURGEON NOTED THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT POLY WEAR WITH MINIMAL OSTEOLYSIS ON THE ACETABULUM. A NEW LINER WAS TRIALED IN ACUMATCH CUP BUT THE STABILITY HE WANTED WAS NOT ACHIEVED. THE CUP WAS REMOVED AND NEW ALTEON CUP WAS IMPLANTED. PATIENT HIP WAS STABLE WITH NEW IMPLANTS. PATIENT AS LEFT IN STABLE CONDITION. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 12280792 ↗InjuryJun 19, 2020Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 19 ½ YEARS POSTOP THE INITIAL IMPLANT, THIS (B)(6) Y/O FEMALE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A LEFT HIP REVISION BECAUSE THE HIP FRACTURED. THE SURGEON BELIEVES THAT OSTEOLYSIS AND POLY WEAR LEAD TO A GRADUAL WEAKENING OF THE BONE AND EVENTUAL FRACTURE. THE HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO A PERI PROSTHETIC FRACTURE. THE SURGEON CHOSE TO REPLACE WITH COMPETITOR¿S DEVICES. IN ACCORDANCE WITH HOSPITAL POLICY WE ARE UNABLE TO RETURN EXPLANTS. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. WEIGHT (B)(6) KGS AND NO ADDITIONAL MEDICAL HISTORY PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10177018 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K993082. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1031-2017 · Nov 7, 2016 · TerminatedAcuMatch A-Series Connexion GXL Enhanced Polyethylene Acetabular Liner, 15, +5 mm Lateralized, 36 mm I.D., Size J.
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices
- PINNACLE 1217-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED735 reports
- NA 1365-52-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED683 reports
- APEX 1246-03-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED3 deaths613 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-20-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED2 deaths590 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED1 death484 reports
- NA 1365-53-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED404 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED388 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-32-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED386 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page